 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:25
|
|
I would prepare my country for defense in war against aggressors. There can't be political solution- angry American mob already decided that Iraq should be lynched and its property confiscated. Even if thousands inspectors would promise thousands times that there are no single warhead in Iraq, it will change nothing I'm afraid.
Last edited by Serb on 29-01-2003 at 00:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by oedo
if I was Saddam, I would immediately destroy all my WoMD I (probably) still have left. not because I´m a nice and cooperative guy. not at all! but this would maybe be my only chance to survive this crisis politically.
on the other hand, the US force is that powerful that even with those weapons I wouldn´t stand a chance to win this imminent war or even delay my defeat.
thoughts? |
BUt what good is mere survival - remember your goal is to go down as the modern Salah - al din, the great liberator and untier of the arabs against the imperialists - give up you WMD"s and youve given up your chance of dominating and uniting the region, expelling the Zionists, taking down the americans - youve given up you historic mission.
Hang on to them, try to ride this out with the help of the French, germans, russians, and lefties, you have a chance of survivinv AND keeping your WMD, and eventually moving on to glory. If your euro pals can buy you a couple of months, your good at least till fall. And you know Bush cant keep this up till fall - he cant keep troops their that long, and he has to worry about more North Koreas (problems that emerge while focused on Iraq) and teh US economy hangs in limbo, waiting for war. No if you make it past April Bush has to back down - and then youve humiliated ywt another US president - youve emerged as the great hero to all the haters and resenters of america - with Osama reviled, and fundie islam a margianlized force, you can make Baathist aecular nationalism the heir, and yourself the great hero. Tehn you can wait for sanctions to end, go out and finsih builidng nukes, take on the region.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
If I WERE Saddam, I would back down completely, implement democratic reforms and retire to somewhere "safe" and enjoy my fortune
If I were advising Saddam with regard to attaining his goals ( as best as I can understand them), I would repeat Rah's sentiments. Saddam should delay, compromise, partially capitulate and generally blur the issues. The idea is to try to deny the US any defining issue or moment on which a war would be launched.
More generally, I am troubled by the idea of US unilateral (or with a handful of supporters) action. Suppose Saddam HAS weapons of mass destruction-- so do the US and a host of countries. Who gets to decide which countries are permitted them? While I detest the Iraqi regime, I wonder on what basis you justify actions -- assuming that there is no proof of direct Iraqi involvment in attacks on the US.
Heck China and Russia probably still have some nukes pointed at the US |
Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. Kuwait invoked its right of self-defense triggering the first gulf war, 1991. That war ended in a cease-fire, conditional on Iraqi disarmament, among other things. Iraq signed that ceasefire agreement and it is binding on Iraq. Iraqs failure to disarm is therefore a violation of that ceasefire, and renews the existing state of war from April 1991. Iraq is thus in a different legal situation from any state in the world, including US, Russia, Pakistan, India, Iran or Israel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sonic
|
|
Vilnius, Lithuania
Dec 2001 time: 07:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Serb
I would prepare my country for defense in war against aggressors. There can't be political solution- angry American mob already decided that Iraq should be lynched and its property confiscated. Even if thousands inspectors would promise thousands times that there are no single warhead in Iraq, it will change nothing I'm afraid. |
I have to agree...
Saddam has no chance anymore in my opinion.
Last edited by Sonic on 29-01-2003 at 00:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sandman
|
 |
Sinister Penguin
Aug 2001 time: 05:25
|
|
If I was Saddam...
I'd bury all the WMDs that I probably don't have in the desert where nobody would ever find it. They'd be worse than useless in combat, and the need for the Americans (and chums) to waste their time with countermeasures is the only benefit there is.
I'd mount searchlights on the backs of trucks and use them to shoot down stealth fighters.
Get the Iraqi people and soldiers motivated! Massive wage increases for the armed forces, with substantial bounties on enemy units. Inspiring speeches and propaganda! The Iraqi national anthem from every radio station and television station in the land.
Get Special Republican Guards to pretend to surrender, before turning on their captors. That should make the American troops more edgy.
Take in volunteers from the Arab world, especially those with experience fighting against technically superior foes. Too bad they'll all be fundies, but hey, might as well make use of them.
Don't let the crusaders take a single functioning oil well.
Last edited by Sandman on 29-01-2003 at 00:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Traianvs
|
 |
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000 time: 06:25
|
|
quote: I'd bury all the WMDs that I probably don't have in the desert where nobody would ever find it |
Hmm, first of all you can still detect nuclear bombs even if they are buried (unless you happen to have a really really really deep shaft)
secondly, according to your plan, it would be better to actually use the weapons, rather than bury them... about the oil fields, burning them wouldn't do any good, as the US don't rely on iraqi oil, if you're going down anyway there's no point in putting extra resources in burning the huge masses of oil (remember, Iraq has a few hundred billion barrels left, i reckon it wouldn't be easy to get rid of all that so quickly).
If I were Saddam i'd indeed try to delay the US until they can't attack anymore due to summer in iraq (temperatures can be hell up there, don't be fooled!), weapnos would be too hot to hold on to, and complicated mechanisms wouldn't work properly in the blistering heat...
of course, if it does come to a war, give them everything you've got, if he's got chemicals, the better, he could us them, if not, no problem, he can still field a reasonably big army, it doesn't necessarily have to be a good one...
it's only needed to give him time and space to flee the country and get settled somewhere safe, it wouldn't be smart to flee right away, leaving the country to the US.. as he wouldn't be able to get a safe hideout that easily...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|