 |
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Actually there may be two power struggles going on: a first from France and Germany trying to show their independence from the United States, and then from the Uk, Spain, Poland, et al., trying to show their independence from the France and Germany.
Even if France and Germany come around on this, the strains in America's "alliance" with France and Germany are revealed. Ditto, France and Germany's relationship with the rest of the European Union. |
I hardly think that the EU will fall apart over this one issue, I think we'll find a common middle ground as we always do and the EU will continue to prosper and offer an alternative large power bloc to the USA.
I think the French and Germans are a little OTT in their anti-American attitudes at the moment but then again Blair's servile attitude stinks big time too. As I said a middle ground of maintaining a good relationship with America ( and naturally Russia & China on the other side ) is essential but blindly supporting/opposing the US should be avoided at all costs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Just wanted to mention that France and Russia have valuable oil contracts with the current Iraqi regime, which in a post war Iraq will (probably) mean diddly.
MrBaggins
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Gatekeeper :
I don't know if a poll in bigger countries need more people interrogated to be representative, but in France, a poll with 1000 people is representative of the population at the time it's being made, with a 3% error-margin. (I humbly guess it is the same in Britain, Italy, and about the same in Spain and Germany) |
I've always been suspect of polls, mainly because some of my fellow professionals in the media rely on them too much, IMHO. The 3 percent margin error, however, seems to be something that crosses all borders, because the representative sample size differs just about every time, depending on who's doing the polling. And don't even get me started on polling methods, loaded questions and so on. 
I'm not sure what a representative sample for the United States would be.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gatekeeper
I've always been suspect of polls, mainly because some of my fellow professionals in the media rely on them too much, IMHO. The 3 percent margin error, however, seems to be something that crosses all borders, because the representative sample size differs just about every time, depending on who's doing the polling. And don't even get me started on polling methods, loaded questions and so on. 
I'm not sure what a representative sample for the United States would be.
|
[Math Rant on]
Actually, margin of error tends to be relatively constant w/ regards to the sample size and regardless of the population (as long as the population doesn't get too significantly low).
So if I am doing a proper scientific poll, and I were to poll 1000 people, I would get about a 3% margin of error (ie, 95% of the times, the response for the entire US would fall within +/- 3%) regardless if the population was 10 million or 500 billion. (The margin of error isn't constant, but the differences are very small despite increasing the population - which was why I said it was about 3%). Obviously, if the population was significantly lower - ie, 2000, the margin of error drops.
Given that the margin of error tends to be about 3% (which tends to be low enough to be of use) for 1000 no matter what group it's representing, most companies don't see the need to go to, say, 2000 polled, which would narrow the margin of error only down to 2%, and the further you increase the number polled, the less the benefit.
The problem, however, is in performing a scientific poll - one in which those selected to be polled are a good representative sample of the population as a whole, and that the questions themselves introduce no bias. So you could poll 1 million americans and not get a result the reflects the real US because you ended up only interviewing republicans, or only democrats, or only people named Bob - none of which would be a good representative sample of the population as a whole.
[Math Rant off]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Drake Tungsten:
"America has gone out of its way to involve our European allies in the decision-making process on Iraq, but our efforts have been repaid with a knife in the back."
You're joking, right? The kittykawks in the admin have wanted this war for a long time, and they do not take opposition very well. We got about 3-5 different excuses for invading Iraq over the years. So, unless you consider "shut up" as an invitation to the decision-making process...
""Old Europe" has already lost the respect of the American government and now it seems that some European governments feel the same way."
I knew the "old europe" phrase was so brilliantly stupid that it would catch on immediately.
Dan:
"It seems incredible to me that France and Germany think that they can drive the EU in the absence of the UK, Italy, and Spain."
You really need an introduction into EU law and politics.
Stinger:
"Why is Blair, if he genuinely agrees with Bush, servile,"
I can't for heaven's **** imagine that Blair genuinely agrees with Bush.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|