 |
Who do you want to be Minister of Defense?
This poll is closed. |
| Turambar |
   |
13 |
52.00% |
| Immortal Wombat |
   |
12 |
48.00% |
| Abstain |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
25 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pedrunn
All were heading for peace! |
thats what they always try to tell you
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
well, perhaps you should mention it will only be 3 cities since you have been outnumbered in the gamechat. after a long discussion a couple of members from your party were convicted of the wiser arguments by members of the APP.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
I've no problem with building the new city now. It's a democracy and the decision's been made.
Whatever people decide to do I shall carry out my job as best I can following their wishes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Vote for Turambar:
I think that Immortal Wombats stance of not considering expansionistic war at this point... we have ranged units... to be deeply flawed.
Without continued empire expansion we put ourselves in a position of falling hopelessly behind technically, as well as being outnumbered on the battlefield.
Our options for expansion are reduced, turn after turn... other civs are founding new cities, and taking up 'dead space' at an alarming rate.
We have the capability to both defend and attack effectively at this point. We can use force concentration, using combined arms; a large stack of swords and bows, to attack a new and vulnerable enemy city. The enemy will not be able to react to this with enough speed.
With another city we not only weaken them, but strengthen ourselves... we grow more, produce more and research more. Isolated and peaceful growth means a quick death for Lemurians.
So, in conclusion "Vote for Turambar!!"
Its a vote for sanity.
MrBaggins
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
We shall certainly have the option of founding a 3rd city, but the borders are closing in fast. Founding a 4th and especially a 5th city seems very unlikely indeed, as the enemy closes in.
We shall be building a settler, as our option to settle disappears, as and when the borders encroach. This time will be better spent arming for war.
We should push back against the evil that seeks to engulf us.
Voting for a peace oriented Minister of Defence when certain war is on the horizon is madness.
Vote Turambar
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: ... we have ranged units... |
so do our neighbours
quote:
Without continued empire expansion we put ourselves in a position of falling hopelessly behind technically, as well as being outnumbered on the battlefield. |
thats why we should build as many cities as possible NOW. and about that technology... maybe mr.baggins believes, we would earn tech by invading cities? i don't like dissappointinh people, but here i have to.
quote:
Our options for expansion are reduced, turn after turn... other civs are founding new cities, and taking up 'dead space' at an alarming rate.
|
they were, all neighbours we encountered so far have reached about 10 cities, so they won't expand any furter at the moment. well, of course unless we give them a good reason to invade us. oh, and btw, we already have a peace treaty with the thai and our relation to the other nations become better and better.
quote:
We have the capability to both defend and attack effectively at this point. |
no, we have the means to protect ourselves if neccessary, but not to wage a war against someone who is bigger and has a lead in science.
quote:
The enemy will not be able to react to this with enough speed.
|
perhaps not with speed, but with power, as i said in the turnchat, we might be able to conquer, one perhaps even 2 cities... then they will strike back with their amassed forces and pummel us to death.
VOTE APP! VOTE Immortal Wombat!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
Just to remind people of the MoD job description.
The MoD doesn't choose which units to build! The MoD doesn't decide if we go to war!
The MoD is responsible for moving troops during peace and war, and can poll if we should go to war or not.
So far I believe I've done good as MoD and work well with the other ministers during turn chats. Voting for me is not a vote for war or peace as that's the peoples decision (which I shall always respect)! I simply think we should be using the war option in terms of expansion.
But if war is declared either by us or another civ I believe I'm the best person to conduct that war!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
i don't question, that you would be a good general, (btw. why do you question IW in that aspect?), but you are drawing a wrong picture of the job. though you can't declare war with a resolution, you can pretty easily move ourselves in a position, were war will be inevitable. i prefer a MoD who wants Defence and works in a way, peace can be secured, not someone who desperately wants to become a MoW.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
child of Thor
|
|
I've been away for the weekend, but my views haven't changed. As most of us have played the game alot i really can't understand the reluctance to have a go at either the austrians or germans to make our empire grow, while taking out a future enemy. I would prefer to strike at recently founded cities first - with our low tech armies we would have a much higher success rate. As a strategy it always works against the AI(at least in Cradle which enables you to expand your empire and not just kill a small city automatically) and is one i use to help my early civ to grow while keeping the nearest AI threat down(as it gets lots of other bonuses).
So in this case i guess i can only vote for one of the candidates.....Turambar gets my vote
Last edited by child of Thor on 03-02-2003 at 18:22
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Devil of Truth
Vote now. Vote often. Get cake. |
Which cake?????????????
Is it a kind of bribe?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Turambar and his War Party believe our nation should attack the Austrians now |
I've never said we should attack NOW at any point. Please find a quote before saying stuff like that. If my plan was to attack NOW then there would already of been an official poll about it.
We are not ready to attack anyone yet. We've got to finish the the settler off, get a new city settled then build up an army regardless of whether or not we want to attack. We're between to big civs and a large military is essential to surivival and expansion.
We will be going to war eventually whether we initiate it or not. And I'd rather be the attacker than the attacked. And add to this the fact that we're running out of room to grow, therefore if we don't take new land and cities at some point then we cannot grow much more. And no growth = us losing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: I am pretty sure Sun Tzu would have advised you not to engage in a war you are sure to lose. |
We are not engaged in a war or will we be for a while yet. I've no plans to plunge us into a war we will lose. Nor would the people of Lemuria let me do so.
We should obviously only enter a war when we are ready to do so. But we should look to be ready as soon as possible or war will be thrust upon us by other civs and barbs whilst we are unprepared.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: When do you think our glorious nation should declare war? |
Once we have enough units to begin successfully taking enemy cities whilst also being able to defend ourselves. This of course will be decided by the people.
quote: Who should be our opponent? |
Austria looks like the best target to me as they are the weakest of the two and have some nice looking city sites. Also the rivers into their territory / cities would speed up troop movement / reinforcements etc.
But again the people should decide who gets attacked.
quote: How do you plan to prepare our nation for war? |
After this election I will come up with a plan for building up for and conducting war to present to the people. It can then be either accepted, changed or thrown out etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|