 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
assination. sometimes the ends justify the means.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
assination- the act of death through sodomy
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DRoseDARs

|
 |
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
"Foreign Policy Powers:
Congress has important powers in the areas of foreign policy and national defence. Chief among these are the power to declare war, to create and maintain an army and navy, to make rules governing land and naval forces, and to regulate foreign commerce.
Congress shares foreign policy and national defence responsibilities with the President. Throughout American history, however, it generally has submitted to presidential leadership in this area. Although Congress has declared war only 5 times, the President, as commander in chief, has used military force in other nations on more than 160 occasions. Most significant of these were the Korean War, 1950 to 1953, and the Vietnam War,1965 to 1973. Both conflicts were fought without declarations of war.
After the Vietnam War, Congress acted to reassert its foreign policy powers. Congress held that the Constitution never intended the President to have the power to involve the nation in undeclared wars. Therefore in 1973, over President Nixon's veto, Congress passed the War Powers Act. This law forbids the President to commit American forces to combat for more than 60 days without congressional notification within 48 hours. Almost every President since the act's passage has protested its constitutionality. During this period Presidents used military force in Cambodia (1975), Iran (1980), Grenada (1983), Lebanon (1983), Libya (1986), the Persian Gulf (1987), Panama (1989), Iraq (1991), and Haiti (1994). Most of these were quick strikes. Nevertheless, in most cases the President notified Congress of the action.
...Congress felt that Nixon and previous Presidents had abused their power as commander in chief. They had done so by involving American soldiers for prolonged periods in an undeclared war in Vietnam. Congress's view was that the presidency needed to be checked, which was the intention of the War Powers Act."
United States Government - Democracy in Action: Presidential Election Edition
Richard C. Remy, Glencoe, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Democracy = elected dictatorship
Particularly in the US and UK where a party majority in the legislature means no real checks on the power of the executive.
The only limitation on these people is that they want to be re-elected but since most are extreme ego-maniacs they believe they can win an election almost regardless of what they do.
No, you don't want to be president, no sane person does and that is why the USA gets the presidents it does.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
President Bush is one of the strongest leaders American has ever had. He is honest, straightforward, dedicated, and pure of heart. Unlike most of the men before him, America can trust him to do the right thing irrespective of the effect that will have on his political future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TheStinger
Oh please, you'll be telling us he's the new Messiah next. |
No, just a decent man.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Osweld
Why is it that many bush supporters, when faced with a possible critisism or argument against bush, just spout off some lame speach like that and completely ignore everything that was said against him - It's like they're brainwashed, or trying to convince themselves he isn't so bad or something. |
This is what the Republicans said about the Democrats who supported Clinton.
Actually, I am not happy with Bush on his continued support for the corporate world, nor am I satified with his economic decisions. But I think he is playing it squarely, honestly according to his beliefs.
A leader is someone who decides what is best and goes and trys to do it. Whereas most politicians stick their thumb in the air and then decide the course of action.
Some people think a President, being elected by the people should administer the law by the will of the people. This is not my way of thinking.
A President should administer the law as he believes is best for the people. This almost certainly means that many times he will be acting contrary to the wishes of the people, else said President is not doing his job.
Going to the UN in the first place was a mistake, as far as I am concerned.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|