 |
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
With an 8-1 vote, I'm ready to view our latest border treaty proposal as ratified. I sent a copy of the latest amended map to the GS mailbox and the usual suspects just to make sure we're all on the same page. Here's a draft of a message to send to Jon with the map:
quote: Greetings Jon and People of Vox Controli:
After extensive discussion and debate (and a bit of scrambling to adjust to Dissidentville's location), Gathering Storm has come to a strong consensus ratifying the enclosed border treaty proposal. (I had to adjust one of our city locations to make it viable with Dissidentville where it is, and another because one of our generals wanted to make absolutely certain that cultural disparities could not cost us control of an iron source.) If this would be acceptable to you, we can have the stability that comes with predefined borders so that both our nations can focus squarely on building up our economies in our nations' cores. That will make both our economies much stronger, both for research and for production, than if we waste early cities on a land grab in high-corruption areas. It will also help us lay a stronger and more stable groundwork for possible (and I like to think highly probable) future partnership in other areas.
By the way, we're sorry if Hack's recent movement caused you any concern. You managed to slip your settler past Grog while he was chasing barbarians, and we thought it prudent to move Hack to a location where he can see if anything that came past with the settler starts heading south. I suppose that might be regarded as paranoia on our part, but it cost us nothing of importance. Under such circumstances, paranoia with the safety of one's people can hardly be considered a bad thing.
Sincerely,
The People of Gathering Storm
Nathan Barclay, Chief Economist |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Of course the know its a land grab, but we don't have to say we compromise because of it. If what we think is true, not acknowledging the city as a land grab that made us compromise won't hurt us or make them try harder, but if we say that we realize the "briliant" tactic which they used, we are giving them the idea that indeed it made us cut our demands, so why not try it again?
I can't see how not implying that Dissidentville made us change plans can hurt us, but if we do imply that, it might.
As for the movement- we can come with a better expression than "scouting around" but putting words like "prarnoia" and Vox "sliping something", IMO, might give the idea that we in fact don't trust them. I don't see going as far as seeing it as us expressing feelings of shame and guilt for thinking this way- its just not how Vox sees us (you certainly don't see your frightening neighbor as a being with guilt and shame feelings).
I don't really oppose this being sent as is, but some changes will make it better, IMHO.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
Rewrote to the second paragraph: How's this?
quote: Greetings Jon and People of Vox Controli:
After extensive discussion and debate (and a bit of scrambling to adjust to Dissidentville's location), Gathering Storm has come to a strong consensus ratifying the enclosed border treaty proposal. (I had to adjust one of our city locations to make it viable with Dissidentville where it is, and another because one of our generals wanted to make absolutely certain that cultural disparities could not cost us control of an iron source.) If this would be acceptable to you, we can have the stability that comes with predefined borders so that both our nations can focus squarely on building up our economies in our nations' cores. That will make both our economies much stronger, both for research and for production, than if we waste early cities on a land grab in high-corruption areas. It will also help us lay a stronger and more stable groundwork for possible (and I like to think highly probable) future partnership in other areas.
By the way, we're sorry if Hack's recent movement caused you any concern. Your settler happened to come south at a time when Grog was away from his normal post hunting barbarians, which raised a theoretical possibility that other units could have come with him. Hack's new position ensures that he can let us know in the unlikely event that units that accompanied the settler might move farther south.
Sincerely,
The People of Gathering Storm
Nathan Barclay, Chief Economist |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|