 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
That's not what this seems to imply. Doesn't come out and say that Arafat was trying to present a defense, but note the contained assumption that there was a "written defense statement" in existence that could have been received. |
http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/glo...=660155&fid=942
quote:
Egged asked for a judgment against Arafat, who did not file a statement of defense. |
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mi...ast/2725607.stm
quote:
The court in Tel Aviv issued its decision after Yasser Arafat's administration did not defend the action brought by the Egged bus company. |
http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtm...storyID=2166492
quote:
Arafat, who has denied Israeli accusations of responsibility for attacks during the 28-month-old Palestinian uprising, mounted no defense in the civil lawsuit, and it was unclear how he could be forced to pay the damage award.
...
The Courts Administration office said that the Tel Aviv court granted Egged the damages from Arafat after the Palestinian president failed to mount a defense.
|
Last edited by Edan on 11-02-2003 at 02:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|