 |
|  |
 |
|
lbores
|
|
scottsdale, az
Sep 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
Which may puzzle some of you young whippersnappers who've probably never played Marbles let alone seen one. But my question has to do with Tech trades.
I will usually only trade tech at the same level. If they're offering a higher level tech, I always check the datalinks. I never trade tech for world maps (unless I'm going to war) and I never respond positively to a coerced trade nor will I pay or trade for a comm link. I'll sometimes do 'a personal favor' for Deirdre but never for Miriam. I hate Miriam - well and truly; it's personal. It's her whole ethos but that's another story. My greatest joy is seeing her being zapped during 'interrogation' and I'm a physician, a healer! Go figure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Anun Ik Oba
|
 |
Grace of God
Sep 1999 time: 00:13
|
|
Many times I will give a higher level tech for a lower level one against the computers, because I know that I will make better use of the created tech equality. Of course, if someone asks me to trade Applied Gravitonics for Unified Field Theory, they are likely to get a PB stuffed in their unmentionables.
But then again, if I am feeling like being challenged by the AI, I will trade or give away techs to my disadvantage; this way, I know that the computer will at least have a fighting against me. Wish I didn't have to do it, but you know how the AI can be.
As far as the AI threatening me to give techs, well, that just depends on my ability to stand against the coercer, or I just take a chance at them going away with only their displeasure, and not a vendetta!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Misotu
|
 |
Leamington Spa, England
Dec 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
I pay no attention whatsoever to the level of the tech being traded, although in MP I meet a number of players who seem to attach inordinate importance to this aspect of the trade. The only 2 things that interest me are:
1 What does it do?
2 Do I want it?
Every tech costs the same to research, no matter what level. If you pursue a very focused beeline that gets you up to level 4 techs and then you have to go back for a level 1, that petty level 1 tech will cost you exactly the same, in research points, as a level 5.
To be honest, I have never understood the tech level ratings, they have little or no relevance in the game. Understanding the tech tree itself - now that's a different matter. Some of the most important techs are puny by "level" rating. Industrial Automation, Gene Splicing, even Env Economics. It really makes no sense to judge techs by tech level.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|