 |
|  |
 |
|
Richard Bruns
|
|
NC, USA
Nov 1999 time: 06:25
|
|
Paper money is already obsolete. Nobody prints paper money. All currency in circulation is, technically, a type of cloth. This is why it does not go to pieces when you wash it.
The bills we use today will be replaced by plastic in less than 50 years. But it will not necessarily be smartcards or anything like that; it will be plastic cash that works just like cash does today. Plastic cash is cheaper to print, looks cooler, and is almost impossible to counterfeit if it is designed well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
i think it could be in a serious transition in as little as 20 years.
frankly, it wouldn't take much.
look: many universities across the country have a system where students use their student ids (the same id they use to get into the cafeteria, library, dorms, etc) as debit cards. Students put money in an account, and anytime they want anything, from a cup of coffee from the on campus shops, or to make copies on a copy machine, all you have to do is swipe your id.
In my city, many of the local restraunts also take these "bear bucks." it is supremely convenient. most students here don't even carry cash, only their id, and maybe a credit card.
This is significant in a couple different ways. first, a growing percentage of the population is already going to be comfortable with the idea. secondly, it shows what is necessary for this to be feesible. That is, convenience. Don't give someone something extra to carry around, and make it easy.
The solution? your driver's license, or state ids. If the gov't would make some kind of initiative to set up a program with a bank, or start a bank, where everyone in the state could have an account linked to their id, the transition could be seemless. most state ids and DLs already have magnetic strips on the back.
And with the way the internet is taking the (non-geek part of) the country by storm, people would have no problem managing this account online, as so many people are starting to do with their bank accounts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
i can't see it happening, paper and coin money will still be useful in certain situations no matter how far into the future you go. i can't see it being bettered for going down the pub, or getting your fags and paper in the morning.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
It was obsolete when it was created ^_^
--"The solution? your driver's license, or state ids."
This is an even worse idea than the various e-cash and smart card proposals that have been tried. Not only would it set up a defacto national ID, but it would tie it to personal spending habits.
Have you looked over the Patriot Act II info? Or the original? Or the various banking reporting requirements? That would be a true nightmare.
--"However, many people don't want ANYBODY to be able to track how they spend their money."
E-cash and the like can actually be done in an untraceable manner. I'll try and look up some of the implementation info later.
The real problem is that no one is willing to do it right (and if it were done right the government wouldn't stand for it, since it would be untraceable).
--" There is an element of traceability, but there is no security risk like those normally associated with debit cards or credit cards."
There certainly is a security risk. It could be reduced far enough for the system to function (same as credit cards, really; security could be vastly improved on these quite easily, but the credit companies don't consider it worth the bother compared to the losses) if anyone was willing to do it.
I still think the main problem is going to be the governments. They have not been friendly towards any such system that made the right steps towards security and privacy.
Wraith
"With money in your pocket, you are wise and you are handsome and you sing well too."
-- Yiddish Proverb
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
--"Would it be a worse problem than paper money counterfeiting?"
In one sense, probably not. The actual cards should be harder to fake than cloth/paper money. However, this isn't the main problem.
The other sense is. The way people would really attack the cards would be to adjust the amount stored on them. If you could hack a higher dollar amount in, or could copy a high dollar amount onto a low-dollar card, etc... You'd only really need to do the apparatus once, then you're set.
It really all comes down to the implementation. No matter what's done, it'll be broken sooner or later. The only real question is how difficult it'll be to do once the basics are discovered.
Designing these things is not at all trivial, and the implementation of them is even less so. There are a lot of interesting attacks that have already been used against smart cards and the like. Differential power analysis, for instance, which measures the amount of power to card uses to help reverse engineer the encryption.
Wraith
"The NSA response was, 'Well, that was interesting, but there aren't any ciphers like that.'"
-- Gus Simmons ("The History of Subliminal Channels")
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|