 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vesayen
Caligastia: that is the first point someone has made in this discussion(talking about it on 2 forums besides apolyton) which made my brain go "Oooh, good point!"-but why do you think that? |
It's a part of Urantia Book cosmology:
http://www.urantia.org/papers/toc.html
quote:
Edit: Upon further though, if your basing that on events in the physical universe, that is untrue, because the universe WILL eventually end........be it one of the theories about a mind boggling large blackhole, OR just wait till the halflife expires on all protons and they fade into backround radiation.... |
How can you talk about these man made theories as if they are absolute truth? Remember, there is very little we humans know for sure about the nature of the universe. BTW the universe encompasses far more than just physical reality.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Iron Chancellor
|
|
But too much of all those good things? Think of how many things make you feel good, in addition to those things which are "good."
Yes, too much cake and ice cream and wild partying, but I doubt you can have too much love, or too intimate a relationship with someone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:25
|
|
quote: "Kramerman's wager: I don't know if there is an afterlife, but in case there isn't, I'm going to live in a box hooked up to an IV fluid dispensar so that I live the longest life I possibly can." |
Thats sorta kinda my philosophy ...
As i see it, we got one life to live, so live it up to the fullest extent. To some, this may be qunatity of life, to others, quality, and to folks like myself it is a balance between the two.
So, incase there is no afterlife, enjoy your life!
Kman
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monolith94
|
 |
New England
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
"Read Neitzsche? (I think it was him). He espoused the view of two options. Life/ the universe exists forever or life/ the universe ends. If the former we are eternally tormented as time repeats itself, if the latter then living is pointless."
What a cheerful guy! I seriously think, though, that these philosophers specifically aimed to deflate the spirits of those around them. Take that tasteful Sartre quote: "Hell is other people". Oh, is it? Maybe it is for you, you friendless, antisocial, goon of a thick glasses, cross-eyed frenchman, but for people who are able to deal with the inconsistencies of life, and even revel in them, heaven is other people. It is for me. If I have to spend heaven alone, I'd kill myself. Oh, wait...
"The problem with afterlife arguments is it assumes the afterlife is like the real world, except without the nasty stuff (or good stuff if you're in hell). I doubt that very much."

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monolith94
That's funny - the more I know, the more I realize how ignorant I am. |
This is the beginning of wisdom.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
hmm... this is kind of depressing, but i think it could be argued that no one has ever had a truly original idea.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Big Crunch
Didn't he come up with the philosophical idea that anything that can happen has happened and will happen again. He had some story about the eternal recurrence of Zaroastra's journey, or something like that, to explain it. |
He did, but, at root, eternal recurrence is really a very old idea (not with quite the spin Nietzsche puts on it).
Empdocles thought that the world alternated between elements being brought together and torn apart.
In Plato's Statesman there is a myth where the world is like a giant spring which God winds up and lets go, only for it to spring back on itself when it reaches the extremity of its extension.
The Stoics (Zeno, Chrysippus, etc.) believed that the universe is periodically destroyed by fire and reborn, phoenix like, from the ashes. Since God plans the course of history from rebirth to conflagration for the best it seems that each cycle will be identical. There is some dispute over whether this means that we will be reborn or whether mere copies of us will be reborn.
As for Plato, I don't think he's that bad. After all the Theaetetus consists, IMHO, of a complete refutation of any non-naturalist or non-Platonist foundationalist epistemology. (Phew!)
In any case, all you have to do to accept Platonism is the thesis that there can be two different things which are really the same in kind. From that the rest follows.
Attachment: plato-3.jpg
This has been downloaded 21 time(s).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|