 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Andy-Man
|
 |
Tory Party of 'Poly
Jul 2001 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SpencerH
They could do as you say. The only problem is that they put themselves in jeopardy to do so. Obviously, not all captured conversations are given the same weight. Messages from peons have less value than those from Bin Ladens lieutenants. In any case, we glean details they didnt mean to give away. Playing such games by senior Al Queda dogs would increase our chances of locating them and now that the American agencies are no longer hog-tied we can dispose of them. |
True, but if the infomation is meant to be misleading, then i am sure there are ways around some of the problems you have stated. I mean, if some peon pretends to be bin ladin, and has a phone conversation with someone saying something, then how will anyone know hes pretending, and how can they NOT do something anyway? BEcause if they ignore it as 'a hoax' and something happens, then you have the outburst against the CIA like what happened september 2001.
OTOH, if every day you lead out a load of troops hyping up an 'attack', and nothing happens, people will loose confidence in any war on terror - either way the terrorists win out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Andy-Man
True, but if the infomation is meant to be misleading, then i am sure there are ways around some of the problems you have stated. I mean, if some peon pretends to be bin ladin, and has a phone conversation with someone saying something, then how will anyone know hes pretending, and how can they NOT do something anyway?
BEcause if they ignore it as 'a hoax' and something happens, then you have the outburst against the CIA like what happened september 2001.
OTOH, if every day you lead out a load of troops hyping up an 'attack', and nothing happens, people will loose confidence in any war on terror - either way the terrorists win out. |
Misinformation has always been a factor in the intelligence business. One phone conversation would mean very little unless they absolutely knew it was Bin Laden (for example). Theres never a smoking gun. Its a puzzle where you get snippets here and there but before anything is acted upon someone has to decide whether or not the threat is credible. That takes time and enough snippets. So to put it in perspective, threats are received all the time but it was only recently (for example) that enough data was judged credible enough to warrant putting out a 'red alert'.
The fact that nothing appeared to happen during the last 'red alert' doesnt mean there wasnt a real threat. It may mean that the threat was foiled. Unfortunately we may never know the truth of the matter and as you point out there is a psychological effect anyway. The reason I find a misinformation campaign unlikely is that we are actively hunting these dogs and their only hope is to stay hidden. If they were actively feeding us misinformation as part of a psychological action aginst us they would be committing suicide.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|