 |
|  |
 |
|
The Viceroy
|
 |
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
I don't buy the notion that the US is a bad guy, yes, they make mistakes, yes they can be gun-ho, and yes, they can occationally appear to see the entire world as being within the borders of the US.. but they are not evil, and I wonder how other nations would act, given the same position in the world ??
What gets me is, those people that talk of thousands of civilian casualties, and how terrible the US is for killing innocent people (some very sad people even accuse them of targetting children !! now that is totally pathetic) say nothing about the abuse Saddam causes his people (accept for the occational bland, "ohh yes, he's bad also").
Where are the marches against Saddam ?? Where are the marches against Al Quida ??
You do wonder who's side these people are on ?
There are many British & Americans who oppose the war, not because they see the US as evil, but because they simply feel there are still other options. They are the people I respect (but disagree with), the individuals who talk of the US as being evil, or G.Bush .. are either gullable, misguided, or have there own agenda.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
General Ludd
|
 |
Minion of the Dominion
Aug 2001 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Viceroy
I don't buy the notion that the US is a bad guy, yes, they make mistakes, yes they can be gun-ho, and yes, they can occationally appear to see the entire world as being within the borders of the US.. but they are not evil, and I wonder how other nations would act, given the same position in the world ??
What gets me is, those people that talk of thousands of civilian casualties, and how terrible the US is for killing innocent people (some very sad people even accuse them of targetting children !! now that is totally pathetic) say nothing about the abuse Saddam causes his people (accept for the occational bland, "ohh yes, he's bad also").
Where are the marches against Saddam ?? Where are the marches against Al Quida ??
|
In the countries that they're in (as much as protesting is possible there, anyways).
You expect people in america to protest against Saddam hussein when they're own government is just as bad? Why, when faced with two evils, do you expect them to ignore their own government and go along with the war by protesting against the government's opponent?
That would be pro-war protesting, not anti-war!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Viceroy
|
 |
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
Sava,
That is the one opinion on the "No to war" side of the argument, I accept is difficult to respond too. My wife is Indian, and so the thought of Pakistan attacking pre-emptivly worries her whole family, and im pretty sure people in Pakistan feel the same way. China & Taiwan is another..
My problem is, some nations out there seem to think its a good opportunity to oppose the US in the UN, just for political gain (elections approaching), even financial gain ... (a few more billions in our direction, and we won't veto !! .. not that id accuse Russia of doing that), or just to try and set themselves up as a credible alternative super-power..
I can understand the frustration the US feels, having to deal with this.. but at the end of the day, it is important that they set a good example in these matters. With that I agree .. but I wish the other "So called" major nations would act appropriatly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mindseye
|
 |
A Yankee living in Shanghai
Apr 1999 time: 13:25
|
|
quote: However, U.S. intelligence officials said later North Korea has demonstrated no new missile capabilities in the last year. The officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Tenet and Jacoby's statements were based on the same information that led U.S. intelligence to conclude a few years ago that North Korea was close to being able to flight-test a three-stage Taepo Dong 2. |
Hold on folks, according to the above quoted AP article, this "news" about the NK having the ability to attack the US was based on the theoretical capabilities of a missile that had never been tested, and may not even exist! This isn't "news" at all, it's simply the restatement of intelligence findings from "a few years ago."
quote: Without flight-testing, the reliability of such a missile fired in anger is questionable |
Imagine you had a small number of untested nuclear warheads of perhaps less than ideal reliability, how many of them would you want to load on a test rocket?
Or even worse, a test rocket aimed at the US! Imagine if something went wrong and the missile failed after it was clear where it was headed! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|