 |
Should we build the road to the iron?
This poll is closed. |
| Build it as soon as posible |
   |
9 |
64.29% |
| Build it, but not in a hurry |
   |
5 |
35.71% |
| We will build it when it's time, but not sooner |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
14 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:26
|
|
As I continue to receive messages of people who don't seem to be so worried about the war and connecting the iron, I've decided to poll the Spanish people to see if this is the common feeling or just the one of a few very vocal members.
The options are:
Connect ASAP -- Connect the iron as soon as posible. Don't worry about efficience. I know that they could do be more efficient with some minor delays, but it's a luxury we cannot allow ourselves right now. Either we connect the iron to build our military and discourage ND or we depend on the ND's good will to continue existing.
Connect but not in a hurry -- We must think about connecting the iron, but why so quickly? At the expense of a few turns we can do a better job and increase productivity if we perform a more intelligent plan for the workers to follow in the way to the iron. And it's only a few turns!
Don't worry about the iron -- That people form the north are peace lovers. They won't attack us in ten thousand years.
Ok, vote and also feel free to defend the option you think more apropiate here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
I have presented Oliverfa 3 Options for getting the Iron connected. They are:
VS is the Visgoth slaves, SW is the Saragossa Worker that is soon to be built. At teh same time, Saragossa is building Walls- Worker-Warrior-Horse-Horse-Horse-Spear-Settler
Option #1 - Gofor Iron ASAP
Move VS to Saragossa #6 and road. Move to Santiago #3 and start road, joined by Saragossa Worker and both move to Santiago #5 and road, then Santiago #15 and road, Then Ironcity #2 and Road, Then the Iron itself and road.
Iron is connected in 1025BC - Saragossa builds it's 2nd Horse in 825BC.
Option #2 - Mine Saragossa #6, then go for the iron.
Move VS to Saragossa #6 and Mine. It's joined by SW and both road and the rest is the same.
Iron is connected in 1000BC - Saragossa builds it's 2nd Horse in 900BC. Compaired to Option #1 - 1 turn later for the Iron, 3 turns earler for the 2nd Horse.
Option #3 - Mine Saragossa #4 (the Horse) & #6
VS Mines #4, moves to #6 (SW joins it here) and both Mine and road #6, the rest is the same.
Iron is connected in 925BC - Saragossa builds it's 2nd Horse in 950BC and it's 3rd in 750BC. Compaired to Option #1 - 4 turns later for the Iron, 5 turns earlier for the 2nd horse.
As we are worried about ND's Military Capablity, we need to be able to build units much faster. The 3'rd Horse can also be a sword, as the Iron will be connected then and they are the same sheild cost. Option 3 is better overall for Spain, as we have the better overall production output over time. I would rather have that second Horse sooner and wait just a little bit more for the Iron (only 4 turns).
E_T
Last edited by E_T on 17-02-2003 at 00:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pikesfan
|
|
I can sleep better at night if I know that Spain is able to get a source of iron so we can defend ourselves against those fearsome Arab swordsmen. If a stack of 5 Arab swordsmen should suddenly appear in front of Madrid, at the very least I would have to send all the young ladies home with their duennas so their families could protect them, and worse, I would likely have to give their money back! Stone axes nowadays, alas, are only good for killing barbarians.
If we can’t defend ourselves, then our lives are dependent upon the whim of foreigners being benevolent or perhaps their bellies being full for a long time after feasting upon Luxia.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|