 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
bob moog and thomas dolby
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
Newton, Einstein, Feynman, Fermi, Dirac and Maxwell, not necessarily in that order. (And I suspect in 100 years time, people will add Witten to that list.)
If I had to pick one, I would pick Newton I think. His ideas really kicked everything off, and without him, where wuld we be now?
Einstein's Special Relativity wasn't that great really - if he hadn't come up with it someone else would have within 10 years I think. His GR on the other hand was amazing (although I am sure we would have GR by now too). It is pretty impressive that his Nobel prize wasn't for either GR or SR - it was for the photoelectric effect. It was such a shame that he never believed in Quantum Mechanics...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
and my **** is bigger than the both of yours!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
quote: Not gravity, he merely expanded a bit on what had been developing since Galileo. Not Calculus, as Lebniz would have gotten it anyway. So only optics. |
Hardly! Galileo and his orbits was nowhere near Newton's level. The big leap is in gravitation was realising that the apple falling and the planet's orbits were due to the same force. It may seem obvious now, but that is with 400 years of hindsight.
And his gravitation wasn't even the best bit - that goes to his three laws, which gave us a kinetic theory which lasted for centuaries.
I would also agree with Frogger that Maxwell was a genius. Do you realise that maxwell's laws are invariant under SR transformations, even although SR was discovered after Maxwell's equations?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|