 |
|
theNiceOne
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
Is there a disadvantage to building a city on a resource? |
As others have answered, you get the strategic resource/luxury benefit, which is the most important part.
However, a city tiles always produce 2 food and at least one shield, so building a city on any resource that gives additional food/shield effectively wastes these food/shields - it is much better to work on the tiles with citizens.
Ex: Wines give one additional food, but this bonus is wasted if you build a city on the wine tile.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
theNiceOne
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk That's correct, you get shields and trade, plus the resource 'credit', but food remians, as always, two. |
I wasn't too clear in my original post. Yes, you get shields, but you effectively loose one shield by building on a resource, because a city built on grassland produces one shield. So when I build a city, I look for the non-shielded grassland tiles to build on.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shr3dZ
|
|
I com'on, we're way past thac0 - now we've got BaB (base attack bonus).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|