 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Just because a certain segment of population is loudest doesn't mean we should follow their whims. |
Granted, democracy is idiotic and the majority are generally morons. This doesn't mean that the majority can't be right, though, and if the majority opposed war, they would be right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: So then your complaint should be that Bush is doing something you feel is immoral, not that Bush is ignoring the people. |
That's always been true. In this case, my complaint is that he always claims to care what the people want, but in this case is stating he doesn't care what people think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Isn't he silly or what? Aren't the weapons inpectors in there doing things? |
Just wasting time when the clock is ticking.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Since when are the protesters 'the people'. |
Since they were born, I think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Well yes there are many who oppose this war but didn't feel like protesting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
No clocks. |
Oh, now you are being just as bad as David. In your world view time doesn't exist?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Others couldn't be bothered but still are againsgt the war.
Actually I'd say 1 protestor is worth 10 citizens since it takes effort to get off your butt to protest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
They are the point of the lance. Then comes the lance proper.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Timexwatch
|
 |
Columbia Heights, Washington D.C.
Jul 1999 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Everyone is missing the real problem here. The question isn't about what America really thinks. That's irrelevant because there is no way to ask every single person in this country. These polls are of small sample sizes and don't even come close to representing 1% of America, let alone the entire country. And DinoDoc made a comment that I disagree with.
Congress does not speak for the people. Each congressman (senate and house) have to speak for around 600,000 people. I think that the US is simply too big for the democracy that the Founding Fathers envisioned. Face it, we're relying on a system that is over 200 years old. I don't think I need to tell anybody that things have changed since 200+ years ago. I'm not saying Democracy isn't the answer, I think that the United States needs to be reformed big time. Corporations with big money "speak" for the people. Money buys media exposure, media exposure gets you in the big 2-party vote off at every stage of government except maybe small local and county government.
Bush is ignoring the voice of the people, but of no fault of his own. The system needs to be updated for the 21st century... the confusion on this Iraq thing just proves my point. |
Sava, you're under the misconception that people are ignored completely by their Congressmen. Yes, cranks are ignored. But each representative has an extensive staff that get done as much as the Congressman. Citizens, unfortuneatly, have a hard time meeting their representative face to face but have ample opportunity to speak with the staffers who directly influence how a Congressman votes. The actions of each staffer have a heavy bearing on how a Congressman deals with local, state and federal issues. There are case officers whose job is helping constituents with their problems.
Just because you can't stroll into their office and speak with them directly doesn't mean you can't have your voice heard. Most people don't bother to figure out how they can get their voices or issues heard.
"Big Business" may effect some of the "Big Issue" bills, but smaller ones that directly effect the daily lives of people can be influenced.
As to the "Voice of the People", what is that? How do you define what the voice is? Is it the vocal minority who is mobilized to protest? Is the "voice of the people" simply poll numbers on a sheet of paper? Until you actually define what that voice is, you should't claim to be it. There are too many voices out there to claim that they are "the voice". The term "Voice of the People" is largely a populist rhetorical tool that has been tossed around too much to the poing of irrelevancy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|