 |
|  |
 |
|
PDifolco
|
|
Hello all
When Civ3 went out I didn't pay much attention, only when I saw PTW I realized that it was a real "Civ", not a damn ¤*$^ p o c like CTP (that I bought...).
I still didn't buy it, but instead got Civ2 out of the basement shelf, reinstalled, patched to MGE 1.3, and was amazed at the mass of good mods and scenarios available, as well as by the game itself that IMO did age quite well...
With Civ2 I can play LOTR, Roman Empire, WWII, Feudal Japan or SW scenarios, all very compelling and well-done. With Civ3 it looks like people will have much more difficulties producing mods due to the new tech complexities.
I'm an old-school strat/war gamer, was already 20+ when Civ1 was released, and have no problems playing "old" games as long as they are good.
So should I put 80 €+ in this game ? I'm already somewhat upset to have to pay for MP, but is it worth it game-wise ?.
OK Civ3 has better graphics and whizbang, but I'm not much of a whizbang fan, usuallly get fed up by animations after 1 hour, and have a very bottomline machine (Athlon 500) that coughs at anything 3D.
For the rest, from what I've read in reviews and sites, Civ3 doesn't seem to have fundamental new features over the 2, but has lost the infinite flexibility of Civ2.
So well, if someone here can convince me that I'm missing an all-time winner, please do ! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
joncnunn
|
 |
Maryland Heights, MO
Sep 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
Major differences betwwen Civ II & Civ III:
Civ II traights strictly described the AI and the only thing different about say playing a Yellow civ compared to a Blue civ was that there would be one less agressive oppoenent early on.
Civ III traights charestics are powerful enough to where different civs should not be played alike. (Example: Religious civs can afford to switch to Monarchy on the way to Republic. Non-Religious civs really can't afford both switchs. )
Anarchy is generally longer in Civ III (4 to 8 turns unless you are Religious)
By default, smaller maps in Civ III have fewer oppoenents and larger maps in Civ III have more oppoents.
Number of oppoenens in Civ III is also editable, I think something like 32 is the SP limit, provided you've created and/or cloned enough additional civs.
Most Great Wonders are less powerful in Civ III than Civ II.
Mere possesion of wonders don't increase your score in Civ III. Culture does, but captured wonders don't produce any culture, only ones you built do.
While planting a spy is easy in Civ III, and investiaging cities via Embassy or spy is also reasonably priced, in Civ III the other spy missions are usually too expensive for the probability of success and what the benfit would be.
Luxary Trading is completly different in Civ III, and techs can be bought on a per turn basis.
Civ III includes cultural expansion of cities and fliping off enemy cities.
By default, Civ III allows mining of grassland & plains tiles while disallowing Civ IIs irrigation of hills and transform.
While Civ II had Settlers & Engineers, Civ III has Settlers and Workers instead. Civ IIIs settlers can't work tiles, but can only form new cities (and join existing ones) They cost 2 pop units to build, but when they found a new city, that city is only pop 1. Workers can only improve tiles & join existing cities. Workers get 2X speed with Replaceable parts. Unless your Industrious, your Civ III workers are slower than your Civ II's settlers improving tiles.
Civ III does not have double irrigation. Instead, railing an irrigated tile increases the food by an additional unit and railing a mined tile increased the shields by an additional unit. There is also no Super Market in Civ III.
Stock Exchanges are only found in PTW. PTW also has a structure called Commercial Docks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Eliminator
|
|
Eliminatorville
Nov 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
Don't mean to hijack the thread, but in your guys' opinion, would it be worth it to buy PTW if you have no intention of paying MP? Is the gameplaying any better?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
I would advise buying PTW even if you don't want it for mp.
It is just a more complete game, more civs, more intuitive interfaces (espionage) ai is harder. a better game, imho
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Eliminator
|
|
Eliminatorville
Nov 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
Another quick one fellas, have the graphics, sounds, or speed of late game turns changed at all from Civ3 to PTW?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Willem
|
 |
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PDifolco
Well, I knew this forum was biased pro- and posted on purpose !!
Guys I don't mean offense, but could you develop a little on why I'll be happy, its great, and so on ?
What I have is a reasonably pretty (for my modest tastes), stable, MP, moddable game with a boatload of interesting mods and scens (that's Civ 2 MGE ).
What has Civ3 that will make me happy to sink 100 € (yes, in France Civ3 and PTW each are at 50 € approx ...) ? |
Well one thing that's been improved since Civ II, is the AI can actually kick some butt once in awhile. Be prepared to get a good thrashing at first trying to get used to the change, it will do things you just didn't expect. Definitely more of a challenge on that score.
Plus on the same token, it's much more challenging trying to conquer other nations in Civ III, unlike the way you could rip through a civ with just a couple of Howitzers and a Tank before. Conquest requires alot more planning and strategy than it did before, at least if you hope to avoid losing all your troops on a futile campaign. But it's much more satisfying if you end up being the one kicking butt. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PDifolco
Hello all
When Civ3 went out I didn't pay much attention, only when I saw PTW I realized that it was a real "Civ", not a damn ¤*$^ p o c like CTP (that I bought...).
I still didn't buy it, but instead got Civ2 out of the basement shelf, reinstalled, patched to MGE 1.3, and was amazed at the mass of good mods and scenarios available, as well as by the game itself that IMO did age quite well...
With Civ2 I can play LOTR, Roman Empire, WWII, Feudal Japan or SW scenarios, all very compelling and well-done. With Civ3 it looks like people will have much more difficulties producing mods due to the new tech complexities. |
That is true. There really are no great scenarios out for Civ3.
quote: I'm an old-school strat/war gamer, was already 20+ when Civ1 was released, and have no problems playing "old" games as long as they are good. |
I personally got bored of it quite easily. I couldn't finish a game at all....
quote: So should I put 80 €+ in this game ? I'm already somewhat upset to have to pay for MP, but is it worth it game-wise ?. |
NO! Even with the patch, I hear PtW multiplayer still sucks.
quote: OK Civ3 has better graphics and whizbang, but I'm not much of a whizbang fan, usuallly get fed up by animations after 1 hour, and have a very bottomline machine (Athlon 500) that coughs at anything 3D. |
Civ3 will probably need something more powerful than your machine to run at an enjoyable level.
If youi want me to critisize the game fully, just say so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Eliminator
|
|
Eliminatorville
Nov 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
I checked and PTW goes for about $45 CAD, a little steep for an expansion pack! Will check on eBay, hopefully it can be had for cheap.
I love the idea of radars and airbases, Celts and Vikings, and especially Koreans, now I'll have a new favourite civ to destroy in all my games (sorry russia).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|