 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
Duncan, have you ever been down there? Do so and then tell me if you still think a majority supports the FARC.
Uribe isn't going to change much in this war, obviously. But at least he's trying to weaken the FARC and increase security, even if both objectives are relative.
Are some liberties going to suffer (like if they weren't already affected anyways)? Obviously. It's the old Freedom vs. Security issue, and Uribe prefers the later, and that's why he was elected.
He doesn't want to legitimize the AUC, but to create a government controlled alternative to them, similar to what happened in Peru, like DanS mentioned.
The problem with the paramilitaries is that, despite what Commies always think, their origin is three-fold (!), thus they have not been a government "appendage" since many years ago, and they never completely were one.
It's a very complex situation. The AUC doesn't look like it will simply disolve at Uribe's whim..
Still, again I must say that peace talks will be the ONLY solution (and they will have to include all sides at the same time), but both factions are very radicalized at the moment....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
This thread is just begging for some of Fez's brilliance!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
I'm going to regret this but....
DuncanK, I'm sorry but I guess you really don't know anything about Colombia, unfortunately.
That page is just a quick half-arsed summary, but they aren't even up to date nor do they go into events in any reasonable depth.
It should probably be called "terrorism 101 for dummies and ignoramuses who lack free time to do serious research"....And yet for you, it apparently contains absolute truth.
I could write up a huge list just outlining many recent FARC terrorist acts in the past few years, months and weeks and other reasons that categorically show them NOT to be just romantic "freedom fighters" anymore, heck even links to pertinent sources, but I don't think it would matter to hard-headed people like you, so I shouldn't bother...
And since none of that is on your perfect website, it's worthless to even try.
As for "not bad", "not many"....? Who defines "not bad" and "not many"? You? Who don't even know half of it?Don't make me laugh and cry.
Certainly NOT people who lack first hand experience and have no idea regarding what they speak of, outside of internet digest texts. Those are only opinions, and highly uninformed ones at that.
This would be so much simpler if I didn't care at all, but darn it..... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lefty Scaevola
|
 |
San Antonio TX USA
Oct 2000 time: 23:26
|
|
FARC has been on the USA list of terror forces to exterpate for some time, the only limitation thus far on USA forces doing so is how much USA involment the Columbian goverment is going to allow.
FARC first of second financial source has been kidnap for ransom.
Last edited by Lefty Scaevola on 23-02-2003 at 06:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
Colombian potential oil reserves are known to have been overestimated over the years, and in any case they are lower than Venezuela's, for that matter.
Further DuncanK, notice how calling the AUC terrorists comes so naturally to you, but it's incredibly hard to get you to call the FARC terrorists. It's not only the U.S. government that can use different standards, you know...
And saying the Colombian government does "nothing" against the paramilitaries is not exact. They may do much less, after all the AUC is not trying to bring it down and they are smaller than the guerrillas, but they do kill, arrest and prosecute some of them when there's a chance.
Even HRW, of all people, admits that the government *is* going after more paramilitaries now than it did in earlier years, when they were much closer associates. Of course there are still officers within the military that consciously cooperate with the AUC, but then again corruption is a common thing among all sides, including the FARC.
(And yes, I've got family living there, in case anyone else is wondering).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
They already are on the list and the U.S. has requested that Castano be extradited, more for drugs than for anything else.
So if I kill 100 or 200, threaten some leftists, and I'm heavily involved in narcotics that makes me a terrorist. Okay, fine.
But if I kill let's say 40 or 50, use indiscriminate mortar attacks that affect the civilian population and their homes, threaten the life of more than 200 elected local mayors, use car bombs that kill more bystanders than intended "legitimate" targets, use bombs against public transportation buses, blow up pipelines causing environmental damage, kidnap 3 brothers and use them as unwilling kamikazes with car bombs, blow up electricy towers and infrastructure that affect the poorest regions of the country more than anyone else, kidnap an independent presidential candidate, threaten indigenous populations, use land-mines that may affect anyone who uses certain roads, protect coca and drug crops and laboratories, also deal with drug traders, and conform urban gangs of mobster-like militias it's all fine and dandy because I'm supposedly fighting for freedom?
I didn't know that, until now.
Last edited by JCG on 23-02-2003 at 09:11
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|