 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CICSMaster One crackpot at at time, Sava. |
Which one, Bush or Saddam?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
I've never complained about the "one-size-fits-all" policy. A piece of advice Bodds... when pointing out hypocrisy, it's important that the conflicting statements come from the same person. 
I'm actually all for treating the supporters of terror the same. Let's remove Saudi Arabia's oppressive regime. They support much more terrorism than Iraq. |
Sava,
if terrorism was the ONLY reason why the US wants to attack Iraq, then i agree with you. But there are many reasons, terrorism is just among them. Terrorism, on the other hand, would be the only reason to attack Saudi Arabia. With all the flack bush gets from trying to knock Saddam from power, do you really think he could get backing to take Saudi Arabia out?
quote: What about North Korea? They just fired a missile into the sea. |
we will deal with them soon enough, im sure. dont wanna spread ourselves too thin, id imagine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
2 billion ? does that number smell since it just came out of your ass? |
here you go:
quote: What is the most popular religion in the world?
With over 1.1 billion adherents, Islam is the world's most popular single religion.
Following Islam, Catholicism, Hinduism, Protestantism, and Buddhism round out the top five.
However, there are almost 2 billion Christians in the world - divided into several subsets of Christianity.
Almost one billion people (one-sixth the world's population) are agnostic, atheists, or indifferent to religion.
For more information, visit my Religion category of resources.
|
http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzreligion.htm
please, you just have to ask for a source next time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
No, it means Christianity is wrong, because 4 billion people disagree with it.
But, as Sava said, where did you get that number?
Evidently you haven't been paying attention on 'Poly as of late. |
with that logic, all religions are wrong (which is fine with me, i just came to a similar conclusion with less flawed logic).
above
no, not really. i got sick of these iraq threads for awhile. I dunno why i came back to it, really. no body changes anybodys' mind, and they just brood harsh feelings, it seems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
jsorense
|
|
Alta California, USA
Dec 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
I half recall that Georing at least twice promised Hitler something that he could not produce: air suppremacy in the Battle of Britain and the resupply the surrounded army in Stalingrad. | IIRC Georing also promised Hitler that the Luffwaffa could destroy the allied troops trapped in the Dunkirk pocket. Hitler halted the panzer and wermarch divisions. The net result, of course, were the 300,000 plus evacuees that escaped rather than surrendered.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:26
|
|
Insofar as I'm concerned, *both* sides in the debate regarding Iraq have made valid points. But neither side seems to understand a fundamental fact, and that is this:
No matter what happens in Iraq — whether we go to war with them, or stick with increasingly-ineffective sanctions and diplomatic solutions that leave Saddam in power — people will die. Innocent people. There are no ifs, ands or buts. People will die. All that matters is when and how they will die. Should war break out, they will die in a matter of weeks, maybe months. Should war never materialize, and Saddam remains in power, they will continue to die as they have since the day Saddam took power so long ago, victims of his secret police, of his purges, of his wars, and whatnot.
There appears to be no solution where lives are spared. Both sides in this debate should agree on that, because it's cold, hard reality.
About the only "silver lining" I can see in war is that death would come soon for some, but might bode for a brighter future for the survivors, whereas the scenario where Saddam remains in power bodes only years and years of gradual torture and death for many.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|