 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
They're significantly less oppressive than regressive taxes, thus can be justified.
Last edited by Ramo on 26-02-2003 at 08:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
Ramo - quote: That's right (by oppression, I mean force, so I might not be saying what you think I am). |
Am I "oppressing" a would-be murderer if I defend myself? If not, then it's not "force" that is oppressive, but the initiation of force, true?
quote: I believe the goal of society should be to minimize authority. |
Authority is not the problem, mis-placed authority is the problem. We all have the authority to defend ourselves from attack, therefore government, on our behalf, has that authority.
You've switched from force/oppression to authority, aren't they essentially the same thing?
quote: So, authoritarian acts can be justified when they reduce net authority. This is why certain prison and police systems can be justified, for instance. |
And how does the use of force to compel a rich or poor person to hand over their money - taxes, progressive or not - reduce this "net authority" if that person is using no force (authority) against others?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|