 |
|
Artifex
|
|
Kentucky USA
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
Will they ever get MP to work? Ever?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shr3dZ
|
|
The MP portion of the CD has been a coaster for me, the SP is fine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TheEmerged
|
|
I personally know 5 people that bought Civ:PTW (by personally I mean know them in the "real world", not via the internet or some other faceless media), not including myself.
4 of us feel Civ:PTW has yet to deliver anything worth $5. The other two (myself included) cling to the belief that someday multiplayer will actually be useful.
Coaster of the Year? When your game is only adding one real feature and that feature isn't working right for a non-trivial percentage of the market, and remains "less than working" months later, I don't think it's an exaggeration.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vmxa1
|
 |
Oviedo, Fl
Nov 2001 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TheEmerged
I personally know 5 people that bought Civ:PTW (by personally I mean know them in the "real world", not via the internet or some other faceless media), not including myself.
4 of us feel Civ:PTW has yet to deliver anything worth $5. The other two (myself included) cling to the belief that someday multiplayer will actually be useful.
Coaster of the Year? When your game is only adding one real feature and that feature isn't working right for a non-trivial percentage of the market, and remains "less than working" months later, I don't think it's an exaggeration. |
I would say that if your assesment was accurate then you would be correct.
It is debatable if it is an acurate portrail. Many find MP to work for them, but I would not disagree that the feature is not working properly.
It is however not the only new feature added. Most people do not play MP and bought PTW for the other components. New civs, new commands, new UU, new units and on and on.
As I said, it is very fair to say you do not feel it was worth the money. I have bought many many games that work as they were represented to do and I did not like them, that does not make them coaster.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HolyWarrior
|
|
CGW was on crack when they gave the original Civ3 a 5-star review.
CGW is on crack now calling PTW a beer coaster.
PTW is the only thing making Civ3 worth playing, and I do NOT play multiplayer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Romanus
|
 |
Somewhere between points A and B
Dec 2002 time: 00:26
|
|
Whether a game is a coaster or not, I think, mostly lies in the eyes of the user.
These cute little polls and top 10 lists make for fun reading, but are only opinions.
I consider most any standard RTS thats released now to be a coaster, and dont get me started on shooters. I want something new and innovative. As a RTS gamer for years, I have a lot of hopes pinned on RON. Finally, a little more than build, gather resources, build, fight.
PTW SP enhancements are nice, really worth maybe $19.99, the MP needs to be fixed....I am mainly interested in LAN. Although I have got my 13yr old son into some Hotseat games.
There are a couple of bugs that I run into a lot that affect SP, and MP need to be more reliable. Patch this and I am happy.
I wont declare PTW a coaster yet, but if these issues arent corrected....that will be my only use for it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|