 |
|
Unworthy
|
|
Upon reading the review, I don't get a sense that the reviewer really spent a lot of time with the game. There was nothing particularly insightful in his comments. Except for the fact that he didn't like the diplomacy at all, when I have read nothing but good things about it.
I generally have a high regard for Gamespy's reviews, but this one seemed rather mediocre.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FatJoeFish
|
|
I think alot of reviewers didn't even bother turning the econ AI off...if they did they obviously didn't realize that some things will still be done by the AI...IIRC only DEA improvements are done automatically when the AI is turned off.
I plan on micromanaging my homeworld and maybe 1 or 2 other core planets...esp planets with mobilization centers....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
booje
|
|
Los Angeles (Los Feliz)
Dec 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
I wasn't too happy to see that you don't choose which technology you wish to develop and that since tech developments come so fast that means resdesigning ships a lot.
I hope most of the issues can be fixed with a simple patch.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alexfrog
|
|
Dont choose what technology to develop? what are you talking about...yes you do.
You allocate your research points among the six schools however you like, and once you reach the right level for the tech, it goes into development, and after a few turns its ready.
Re: turning off the AI. I recommend not turning it off, except maybe for your homeworld at the very very beginning. You need to learn how to contol the AI well.....not micro things. There are lots of ways to control what the AI does from a macro level.
Re: reveiwers not giving good reveiws. I dont see how anyone who hasnt played the game at least 10 or 15 hours could give a good reveiw. So many cool features of this game depend on learning and experience....like controlling the AI well so you dont need to micro. This is not like other TBS games where its all about microing....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ashbery
|
|
It just wish that the game was reviewed by strategy fans and not these simpleton game reviewer's that think C&C generals is complex strategy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Craig P.
|
|
The thing about "don't choose what technology to develop" is a reference to the fact that you automatically research all the applied techs once you have the right theoretical tech. It looks like Mr. Abner would have preferred the older design. (As would I, it's one of the few design decisions they made that I still disagree with.)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|