 |
|  |
 |
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000 time: 17:13
|
|
I cant disagree with that, and I usually make it a point to steal IntInt as soon as possible. I don't research it myself usually, because Planned is so important, and once you have planned you are but 3 techs from ind auto.
However a pirate strategy I was playing around with was making a bee line to IntInt, basically sven has great difficulties with drone control, mineral poor bases so rec commons hard to build. Poor effic, = less bases = more drones. Bases more spread out (to take advantage of specials) = more energy lost to in-effic, compounded by poor effic. This leaves sven with no easy way to control drones. By getting non-lethal methods you can control 2 drones for a cost of 1 mineral row. Also sven can trade for other techs if need be. Also on the IntInt bee-line is democracy, which really helps sven to turn a profit, sven does not benefit from Planned much, and his crawlers are expensive. So the ind-auto bee-line isn't very good. Once you have the tech up to IntInt some great possibilities present themself:
Gene Splicing: Turn those kelpbeds into high-quality specialist income, and council votes.
Planetary Economics: Get that trade pact in place, and watch the income roll in, sven can easily win the gov if Lal is not around, and with his multiple treaties can really rake in the trade income. Especially good if you got PEG to0.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000 time: 17:13
|
|
When playing Yang I make it a priority to steal IntInt, I rarely research it myself, the reason being PLANETARY NETWORKS is the MOST important tech for yang, this gives him Planned, which is a no-loss SE setting for Yang. It gives probes, which means if your research is behind you can catch up. You have to assume you wont be able to trade much as Yang.
The other reason why I don't research IntInt is because I don't need it early. I'm a Builder. So every base gets 2 Scout Patrols and 2 Formers (2 formers is why Yang can outbuild "builder" factions), still leaving industry untouched. These 2 scout patrols let my bases grow up to size 2 or 3 which is as high as they can grow with forest. In my SP building bases I have 3 scout patrols, one probably supported by a nearby base. Once WP is done I probably have IndAuto so I start the condensors, and crawl them. If I don't have IndAuto I just work them. Now at this stage my bases grow beyond 2 or 3, so I start looking for improved methods of a drone control. Usually this is a rec commons, bringing my content pop up to 4, so once a base grows to 5 I turn one into a specialist, at this stage my research takes off. Having non-lethal troops would not improve this strategy at all, the only bonus being I wouldn't need a rec commons. But with +3 Industry a rec commons is cheap for Yang.
Once I get to those higher techs though, particually clean reactor I turn all those garrisons into Clean,Police. With 3 per base, a tree farm, and VW or HoloTheatre I'm ready to pop boom, you can't pop-boom as Yang without having basically every worker on the field bringing in energy, which probably means lots of forests and a few boreholes, crawlered food. NOW having 3 non-lethal troops, a rec commons and holo theatre let's my bases have 10 content workers. So I boom my bases to size 10, or higher if juggling specialists allows. A Hive pop-boom is a fearsome thing indeed, and very easy*.
So to summarise, a hive base wont grow above size 2 or 3 while working forest. You can afford to have 2 scout patrols per base, and 2 formers or attackers. No need for non-lethal at all.
You only need non-lethal police as Yang if you want to pop-boom, in order to pop-boom you need extensive infrastructure. But you wont have this early anyway. So my opinion is that IntInt is an important mid-game tech for Yang, but just a "nice" early game tech.
* for Yang to get a GA you need holo theatres and treefarms at minimum, research hosp. for pop>8 or so.
Then you need several boreholes per base, these are the only non-FM way to get energy of the scale needed to GA.
OR: Get hybrid forest, the +1 energy per forest and +50% pysch makes GA possible without boreholes.
In my experience it is easier to have lots of boreholes than hybrid forests, this is because Hybrids are so expensive they should be rushbuyed, Yang is cash poor but support heavy, so should have lots of formers. The oppisite applies for Morgan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aginor
|
|
Winston-Salem, NC
Dec 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
OK, I've played a LOT of Yang, and I've come around on this question...
I used to think that hitting IntInteg fast after PlaNets was the way to go. Because you're right in that the cost savings from not building the Rec Commons, the Holo Theater, and the Research Hospital early are HUGE. I find I'm rarely all that cash poor as the Chairman, since I use what I do get to rush build stuff early on so I can get as many revenue-producing bases up as fast as I can.
Really, the big advantage to having Police State without penalty on Transcend is the ability to just keep slamming out bases after you start getting Bureaucracy drones. See, by the time you get to around 10-12 bases on a Standard map, you can't build any new bases that will quickly have than one productive worker without building an SP - be it the VW as Zak, the HGP or the PTS. Otherwise you're stuck building the Rec Commons before you can even make the base productive, and that takes time or money you don't have to waste.
Yang (and to a lesser extent Santiago and Lal) don't have to care and can just expand with a will early on if they get the space without worrying about building the infrastructure to race for early projects. It leads to very different base structure, so you can expect to see heavily terraformed Deirdre, Zak and Morgan land, while Yang is too busy building bases in the first thirty turns to stress Formers (or use them for anything other than roads until after 2130, really).
But...the difference between three and six content citizens isn't that huge early on, especially since you've got to do A LOT of terraforming as Yang to have any shot at pop booming bases. If you've got Crawlers a size 3 base can build a Rec Commons at a pretty good clip, and you won't see the other size of size 5 much until you have IntInteg through theft or your own slow research. Now, don't think this means I ignore Non-Lethal Methods - my usual garrison is a best-armor ECM unit and 2 Police Infantry at interior bases. No need for Trance units - there isn't any Mind Worm that can kill 3 units, and if it kills one I turn around and kill it for the 20 or more credits.
(A 7 Mineral unit for 20 credits is a great trade, folks.)
Also...I've gotten in the habit of racing to IndAuto as Yang and slamming up the PTS by 2150. Obviously, that doesn't include getting to IntInteg early. Most games against the AI you can get the PTS and the Command Nexus up by 2160 and just turn the world into your very own slaughterhouse. In MP PBEMs starting strategy isn't too relevant, as you usually end up playing accelerated starts (to save yourself a month or better of play time).
It's worth noting that Police State/Planned/Wealth as Yang is the strongest Social Engineering option in the game - it puts you at -1 Economy (which is negligible - it means -1 Energy just at the HQ), +3 Growth, +3 Industry, +2 Police, +2 Support, and -2 Morale. Strong, no? It's worth pressing on to get IndAuto ASAP for that.
Also, you can go straight for IndAuto as Yang. Try this: InfoNet -> PlaNets, then IndBase -> IndEcon -> IndAuto, then you can immediately get CentEco. You should be able to polish off the whole tree in about 35 turns if you use CPs to build The Hive (or other base) up to size 5 and then convert all its workers to Librarians every other turn (provided you can get a surplus nutrient in the box when the citizens work). Then it's time to get Formers out, build Crawlers, cash them for the PTS, and then go HOG WILD with Colony Pods.
At that point the game is over...but you can play it out just to see how badly you can slaughter the computer with this kind of position advantage.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:13
|
|
Ned et al,
I admit to having played Yang only twice, and probably not particularly well at that. But perhaps a terraforming / specialist strategy would be useful to overcome Yang's money woes (as described by Ned). By using condensor / farms, and either crawling them (if you have IA) or even working them you should be able to create some cash flow by using specialists. Since Yang has some trouble Pop Booming it seems best to use crawlers if possible. Another bonus here is that by using specialists the need for Rec Commons / Holo Theatres is reduced. (Really, once you have crawlers there is no need to have any workers at all in the extreme case, though you will obviously want some for high production squares like boreholes eventually.) Of course you will want the WP so that you can build the condensors early, but you will not need to lift nutrient restrictions in order to get the 4 nuts. Certainly Yang's support with PS works well with a terraforming sttrategy as Blake points out.
One problem with this strategy could be the difficulty in getting your bases up to 5 pop in order to have a choice of specialists. Yang is well suited to getting around this though, as he has excellent growth running planned, and excellent industry also. Simply grow your bases by crawling Nuts, or pod boom by crawling Mins and / or Nuts to a small base which will quickly grow back to two pop. (The PTS strategy of disbanding and rebuilding a base will also do well for this.) It is interesting that both Blake and Aginor are advocates of fairly early crawler use by Yang, as it wouldn't seem to be Yang's bag, baby. It does seem to be a strong strategy though, especially if you can get IA as early as they seem to.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000 time: 17:13
|
|
It is actually quite easy to build up a size 5 city for Yang, assuming you got the WP, Yang has an excellent chance of getting the WP, he has +1 industry and +2 police,support going for him, so you can have a size 4 base with 0 minerals used on support, not bad really. The main thing which would stop you getting the WP is someone else cashing in AA's.
The map settings I tend to use are:
Huge/High Erosion/Arid , and either high or low native life.
No pod scattering.
Directed Research
This is somewhat different from low erosion, high rainfall and pod scattering on, and would change my opinion of the value of IntInt somewhat.
So resources are pretty thin, no income from pods and very limited terrain for base growth. Thus Cent.Eco is a very high priority for me, and I start planting forest. Bases with a nutrient resources get building pods, bases without build a couple of formers then a pod. One base with a nut resource is grown or pod-boomed up to size 4 and used to build the WP, and pre-crawler I also use probeteams to hurry the WP if I think I am falling behind (probe teams not needing support, and very handy to have lying around).
After cent-eco I beeline to IndAuto, I don't think you can research that directely so I grab Social Pysch too. This research can take a while, and I've probably finished WP before getting crawlers. So I get my 2 formers per base to build condensors, these are done in no time, gangs of 4 formers finish a condensor in 2 turns. Then work the condensors, once a base reaches size 5 convert 2 workers to libarians. As soon as IndAuto arrives get crawling the Condensors, I always crawl nutrients in favour of minerals, this supports lots of specialists. Once a base is crawling 1 or 2 condensors I start crawling forest. I build little other than crawlers and formers for a long time, I end up with quite a lot of specialists, and few facilities. I like to drill a few rivers, every bit of energy helps after all. I stop building crawlers once I've ran out of SP's to build. Now I work on facilities, building up to my pop-boom and complete global domination.
So when I play Yang I am far from energy poor, I also have only 2 or 3 workers per base (= no drones), the rest are high quality specialists. My choice of conditions means that the PTS is as much a curse as blessing, I would need significant terraforming in order to stop a base starving.
I can see the merit of ICS'ing and heading to IndAuto, but surely that would require a rainy, low-med erosion map. My strategy pretty much assumes worst case conditions.
If I fail to get the WP... well, I guess I would just build more bases, build the CN and play Yang like most people think he should be played. (+2 support = lotsa military, rather than +2 support = former hoardes)
edit: In reply to ned's reply to my second reply by "cash poor" I mean cash poor compared to a Free marketeer, so I have plenty of cash for facility upkeep, selective upgrades and selective rushbuys (tanks, commons, netnodes), but not enough to throw into rushbuying hybrids at 300 a pop. Now once fusion labs and engineers have come along...
Also my WP centered strategy works equally well on doubleblind, it's just the bee-line to IndAuto could take 150 years. It also works for any faction which can snag the WP, but Hive, Drones, Believers benefit most.
[This message has been edited by Blake (edited April 11, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:13
|
|
Ogie,
Good to see you are still lurking buddy!
Blake,
I tried the strategy out to about m.y. 2060 today. No problems at all, except I started on an island just small enough to not qualify for a unity transport. I went for Cent. Ecology 1st, and then straight to Ind. Auto. I had crawlers at about 2055 (I had the WP built about 2050). By 2060 I had raised two corners of my island to connect to two other islands, about doubling my available land area, had built the Command Nexus, and two condensors. I have the VW about 50% completed as well. My island is otherwise 90% forested and mined. I see nothing but smooth sailing ahead, as I am experienced in terraforming, crawlers and specialists.
The Planet I created was huge, low erosion, low rainfall (very advantageous for the human player as the AI doesn't terraform well) medium native life, pods on. Seems a good strategy, though it will be a while before I can lift all the restrictions. Until then I'll keep busy with both horizontal and vertical growth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:13
|
|
Gentlemen, I do not debate that IA is a tremedous tech to get for any faction. It allows several bases to contribute to producing SP's. It allows a boost of mineral production until the Planet screams in protest. Ditto energy and minerals. However, w/o Non Lethal Methods, Yang will still have small bases and be cash poor. This forces one to ICS. But that causes Bureaucracy drones, which further hampers Yang's development.
As you can see, I am a builder. I usually like to play on 180x180 maps. With this size map, the AI forces are not in constant combat. They tend to develop infrastructure at about the same pace the human player does. It makes for a very interesting game. Also, I do not like managing a large number of bases. It makes the game tedious. I would prefer to win with around the number at the first Bureaucracy warning, which in a 180x180 map is around 15.
Actually, I won my most recent game with only seven core bases. I had to pod boom and crawl energy from the sea like mad, but it was really interesting keeping up with AI factions like Aki that had 30+ bases.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000 time: 17:13
|
|
quote:

However, w/o Non Lethal Methods, Yang will still have small bases and be cash poor. This forces one to ICS
 |
Ned, are you sure you understand the yang-specialist strategy? By crawling food to bases you can turn most of the population into specialists. Without IntInt you can't have a large number of workers per base, but a size 7 base with 3 workers and 4 specialists (supported by crawlers) only requires 3 standard scout patrols to control drones. And there is NO way (in the early game) you can create more energy with 4 workers than 4 specialists. If the first 2 workers work boreholes in both cases, then the only way 4 workers beat 4 specialists is tidal harnass+thermocline, which requires a hefty amount of tech.
I am not an ICS'er, maybe a CS'er , I stop after about 10 cities, but I make sure to get those cities as soon as is reasonably possible.
So if you are determined not to use specialists then intint is indeed essential for builder yang, but if you choose the (more powerfull) specialist approach intint is almost completely reduntant. It really depends on how fond you are of having screenfulls of formers and crawlers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:13
|
|
Blake, Yes I think I understand using technicians to produce economy (+2), without loss. However, the central problem I have with using a worker as a specialist is that that worker "could" produce food, minerals and energy. Early in the game, specialists produce only energy or labs, not both.
The problem of loss due to distance is somewhat solved if one keeps his empire small and bases close to home base.
But to do the specialist approach crawling both food and minerals, you really need a lot of crawlers or the Weather SP. (And I suppost, what you do is make farms on moist ground, rather that forests. Not so? Later, when you get tree farms, you redo the farms into forests.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:13
|
|
quote:

Originally posted by Ned on 04-17-2001 11:47 AM
Blake, Yes I think I understand using technicians to produce economy (+2), without loss. However, the central problem I have with using a worker as a specialist is that that worker "could" produce food, minerals and energy. Early in the game, specialists produce only energy or labs, not both.
 |
Well you could mix up your specialists any way you like. Librarian, technician, doctor, whatever you need. It's very flexible, unlike energy allocation which is difficult without a paradigm economy, and it is base specific unlike energy allocation, so you can only use the doctors you really need. (Though you may not need any, as your population is under control due to specialists!)
As for the portability of workers, they are pretty useful in that way. I replace them with crawlers for food and minerals, using the specialist to take care of the energy needs of my empire. Fortunately, crawlers are even more portable than workers, since they can harvest resources from outside the base radius. This allows me to continue to expand a base's production beyond what it could normally expect from a worker based economy.
"But to do the specialist approach crawling both food and minerals, you really need a lot of crawlers or the Weather SP. (And I suppost, what you do is make farms on moist ground, rather that forests. Not so? Later, when you get tree farms, you redo the farms into forests.)"
Crawlers are cheap when your first few are set to harvest minerals. Once you get 15+ mins it only takes two turns to crank out a crawler. Two turns production can yield a whole lot throughout the game. Assuming only two nutrients yield for a crawler, that production can yield a librarian (3 labs). Compare that to a biology lab for two labs with upkeep. A crawler on a roaded mine will pay for itself in 4 turns, or 8 turns before restrictions are lifted.
I don't ever look back (ie foresting after tree farms). The production of forests with workers though good just doesn't stack up to that of a specialist approach. Look at the numbers:
Forest with Tree Farm = 2 food (feeds the worker) + 2 nuts + 2 energy. Total = 4 FOP net.
Forest with Tree Farm and Hybrid Forest = 3 nuts, 2 mins, 3 energy. Add the extra nut in the form of a specialist (engineer) = +2.5 energy. Total = 7.5 FOP per square.
Farm and condensor crawled = 4 food = 6 energy with Librarians, 8 energy with Empaths or Thinkers (though the psych may be wasted), and 10 Energy with Engineers. All that, and no drones, no energy lost to inefficiency, and the flexibility to allocate your energy as you see fit without running a paradigm economy. It's even better with soil enrichers, where the output from engineers = 15 energy.
The squares I do work are boreholes (12 fop) and shelf squares with kelp / harnesses (4 energy + food for 1 specialist = 9.5 energy total assuming engineers)
The cost to this extra production is terraforming and crawlers. Both can be a good bit steeper initially than simply foresting and working, but the payoff is higher production and no support cost in the long run.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DilithiumDad
|
|
I rarely use specialists as Yang, even though I go crazy for specialists as Didi, Lal or Zach. The reason is that I wnat maximum excess nutrients to grow my population. Sure, crawl in nutrients, but use them to grow the pop of The Hive in particular but also your other inner-ring bases.
------------------
Creator of the Ultimate Builder Map, based on the Huge Map of Planet, available at The Chironian Guild:
http://guild.ask-klan.net.pl/eng/index.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:13
|
|
Dilithium Dad,
I use specialists a lot with most factions for a couple of reasons. Firstly, they can really help minimize the effects of low or moderate efficiency in several ways. Obviously one of the main ways they do so is by producing energy without losses to inefficiency. Secondly, they reduce drone troubles by taking workers off the land, making them immune to becoming drones. This same principal allows for greater horizontal expansion, and the drones which come with it.
I don't trade growth rate for specialist income though, I trade minerals for energy. A one time price of 1 or two turns production produces a crawler, which replaces a worker on a condensor / farm or mine. This worker then produces a decent amount of energy (actually labs, econ or psych) without further cost to me. As long as I have terraformed squares available, I can pop boom industrially through crawler production.
Another advantage of this system is that it makes maximum use of space. Every square ends up highly terraformed, and every base ends up with at least 10 specialists pre-hab domes. The bases are close together, two or three squares away from each other, which minimizes their distance from the HQ and also minimizes the time necesary to place them early on. They are also easier to defend due to their proximity. One disadvantage to this system is that I am not denying huge areas to other factions by spreading out more. Since I tend to play on huge maps, the extent to which that is possible is not all that great anyway, though on standard and smaller maps it would be something to consider.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|