 |
|
Zylka
|
|
I don't think the commercial developers have chosen anything yet
In any case, dissapointing. Not as bad as the runner up - but quite randomly mediocre and lacking of presence
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
The helix one was a terrible joke, without any capacity for business floors even
As for this, there is no construction planned. All this represents is a municpal committee decision. Reality and the real developers will hopefully bring it crashing
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Reality and the real developers will hopefully bring it tumbling in a chalky cloud of terror, much like a medium sized passeneger jet full of enough fuel to feed a fire which bends its structural integrity beyond sustainability
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Noooo!
It's the ugly one! I wanted the two big huge pretty towers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
it's ok i guess. i'd prefer something bigger, and taller ala that frank lloyd wright design(the mile high or something).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
It's simply a lackluster design for a site of monumental importance. I would embrace a project like this in any convential large city and note it as a success... but in terms of replacing the WTC, it falls more than short
Although I'm not too fond of Ghery, he seemed to put it well in saying that all of the worlds top monuments should be easily recognizable from a 10 second (max) free hand drawing. Here we have the ever elusive horizon fallback sized towers in a vain impression of quartz growth, which has absolutely nothing to do with anything at all (but perhaps wowing citizens with full glass facades, much like raccoons who have stumbled upon a piece of tinfoil). BUT - then we see that the architect(s) have made things all better by erecting a pathetic and finacially non committal "world's tallest" sewing needle, sporadically dotted with gardens in attempting to answer and deny the organic structure fad
Who designed this anyway, Daniel L?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DRoseDARs
No! It was designed for Chicago, not New York. I'm sorry, but I was born in Chicago and it has always bothered me when people suggest that THE Illinois should be built anywhere other THAN Illinois. New York should get it's own design, not someone else's IMO. |
i agree new york should have their own design but all their designs haven't been nearly as good as the mile high imo. would you rather have the mile high built somewhere else(eg new york) or never?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|