 |
|  |
 |
|
Catt
|
 |
California - SF Bay Area
May 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
Nice AAR's all - I am sorry I missed this one.
badams52 - have you fallen off the wagon yet? And was your (temporary) exile self-imposed or spouse-imposed? On a more serious note, I also think the "keep an OCC civ around for technology advantage" is a worthwhile strategy. Unless I have any real fear of flips, or unless an OCC's presence bears additional indirect costs to me, I like to frequently leave them alive for (1) the tech pricing issues you identify, and (2) the role-playing pleasure of allowing them to forever dwell on their mistakes in challenging the strength of my civ. A few OCCs also offer the flexibility of "managing" the majority needed for a UN win -- 6 civs left and I need 4 votes? but if one of the OCCs (who hates me the most) were to retire, then I only need 3 votes . . .
nbarclay - I too like the format of replay screens which show the whole map -- but I'd also like to see regular old screenshots as well -- getting the occasional glimpse at city spacing, troop dispositions, income slider positions, treasury, research goal, etc. helps me get a feel for a specific instant.
Dominae - very good lessons -- I like that format as well (but where is lesson 4?). And though I play a style somewhere in between (and far from) "optimal for the win" and "UP," I too am not a huge fan of playing for UP (*ducks*), though I do like to see Arrian's and others' reports on what they achieve and how they achieve it. But my "UP-like" tendencies of building and some of the micro-management that it requires come from a similar dislike of achieving strategic parity/lead and then rolling over opponents towards a domination win (as NIC games teach is generally quite easy to do).
Catt 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Catt
(but where is lesson 4?). |
Oh, it's there, in my third big post. I suggest you go back and check it out...
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
badams52
|
 |
near the magic kingdom
May 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Catt
badams52 - have you fallen off the wagon yet? And was your (temporary) exile self-imposed or spouse-imposed? On a more serious note, I also think the "keep an OCC civ around for technology advantage" is a worthwhile strategy. Unless I have any real fear of flips, or unless an OCC's presence bears additional indirect costs to me, I like to frequently leave them alive for (1) the tech pricing issues you identify, and (2) the role-playing pleasure of allowing them to forever dwell on their mistakes in challenging the strength of my civ. A few OCCs also offer the flexibility of "managing" the majority needed for a UN win -- 6 civs left and I need 4 votes? but if one of the OCCs (who hates me the most) were to retire, then I only need 3 votes . . . |
I'm surprised someone cares, but since you asked, it's self-imposed, wife-influenced. She would still let me play, but I can get too involved and then instead of going out at 6:30 like planned, 7 rolls around and I'm still playing, 8 rolls around and I'm still playing, which wouldn't make any wife very happy and I've grown tired of anger management.
And you know how hard it can be when dinner is on the table and you're saying, "but honey, just give me 5 more minutes and I'll have wiped Mao off the face of the earth." (and when is it really 5 more minutes).
Then there's all the time that I spend away from the game where I'm thinking, "okay, once the RoP runs out with India, I'm sacking his cities with my cavalry upgrade," but that's another matter.
Glad to see someone else keeps those OCC civs around. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|