 |
|  |
 |
|
Lazarus and the Gimp
|
 |
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000 time: 05:26
|
|
Do you have any idea how difficult it is to lose money when you're a British high street bank? It's really tricky. Not one of them reported any annual loss at all for over tem years from 1992, and losses were about as common as coke habits among Carmelite nuns before then. Frankly, any fool could keep them pottering along and making a modest profit. However that's not good enough for some pushy public-school tosser with a greed-induced priapism, is it? Someone like Ian Harley, in fact.
In the time Ian Harley ran the Abbey National, it's share price dropped from £14/share to less than £4/share. If you think that's impressive just keep reading. They have just announced an annual pre-tax loss of .....
.....wait for it....
.......£984,000,000. So after 10 years in which not one British high street bank has reported an annual loss of so much as a single shiny penny, the Abbey has just lost nearly a billion pounds.
Remember the Millennium Dome? How the TV and newspapers were full of stories for literally years about what a catastrophic waste of money it was? £984 million would have paid for it. What's more, Abbey still has around 2 billion pounds sunk in "junks and toxics". So was Mr Harley hounded out of town in rags? Nope.
quote: Mr Harley's pay-off was part of a £6.44m package handed out in compensation and pension contributions to five senior directors who left last year after a series of problems engulfed Abbey, including a black hole in its wholesale bank and weakness in its life business. .....Mr Harley received a £372,000 bonus on top of one-year's salary, amounting to £687,000. He also received £560,000 in pension benefit for his final-salary scheme. |
That pension bonus is my favourite. While employees get laid off and shareholders see dividends cut, Mr Harley gets half a million quid purely to ensure he can put his feet up on a full final-salary pension on top of the million pounds he got.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
http://currentissue.telephonyonline..._price_failure/
quote:
The price of failure
by by Dan O'Shea
The captain should go down with his ship, rather than stowing away in a dry, cash-lined dingy.
The latest price tag on failure is $12.5 million — the value of the severance package Lucent awarded to former CEO Rich McGinn. He also will receive an almost $1 million annual pension, plus insurance, as well as $9000 per month for the office assistance he will need to find a new job.
McGinn was canned last fall amid embarrassing allegations of financial mismanagement and poor strategic vision. He presided over the worst economic performance in the history of a company that was once the largest — and before that, the only — major telecom equipment maker in the industry. Lucent can virtually be traced to the DNA of Alexander Graham Bell, and McGinn was the leader when it began to fall apart — its stock price plummeting from about $80 to around $6 to $7.
It was McGinn who headed Lucent as it was forced to pre-announce earnings for three consecutive quarters because of unpredicted shortfalls — at a time well before the economic downturn had cut a swath across the telecom industry. Some reports during this time suggested McGinn was too busy trying to rally Wall Streeters to see that Lucent's employee motivation and morale were flagging.
McGinn was the guy who allowed Lucent to get into the private golf course business. Things were so messed up during McGinn's tenure that the SEC is investigating the company. Meanwhile, shareholders and employees are up in arms, and some employees are now suing the company. More than 20,000 employees were laid off by Lucent this year, and many thousands more left, retired early or were laid off prior. Even now, rumors are circulating that more layoffs are imminent.
Making sure these things did not happen was McGinn's responsibility, but they happened. And after presiding over one of the quickest, strangest and most public corporate failures in history, McGinn still gets his millions.
You can say what you want about CEOs deserving every penny they get because it is what the market will bear, or about companies needing to guarantee nice golden parachutes if they want to find good executives to lead turnarounds. You can say CEO jobs are limited (though not so much anymore), and companies need to provide exit pay according to certain standards of living. You also can say that McGinn could have made out much better. His complicated deal gives him $5.5 million in cash and $7 million in stock, but Lucent will buy back that stock to pay off loans McGinn took out with Lucent's assistance. Even so, McGinn will pay Lucent more than $4 million over the next three years to further pay off those loans. You can say this is a typical CEO severance deal, and that much is true. But there should be nothing typical about failure.
The captain should go down with his ship, rather than stowing away in a dry, cash-lined dingy. Tens of thousands have lost their jobs under the leadership McGinn was unable to provide. He is getting too much, and it sets a bad image for current and former Lucent employees — as well as the investors Lucent is trying to woo back.
Were McGinn to have received less cash or no help paying his loans, it would have been a first in CEO severance; it would have made Lucent look cheap. However, Lucent's board of directors, which let McGinn stay in charge much longer than it should have, is now letting him get away with a fat severance, apparently just to keep up appearances. Maybe the directors have not noticed, but Lucent is still a company in a shambles, and a big payout in the midst of such disaster is a slap in the face to Lucent's current and former employees. Boards have been letting CEOs get away with rich severance deals in bad times for too long. Boards, like CEOs, have to be held accountable to those they serve — employees, investors and customers.
There is a price for failure — it's being paid by the thousands who went to work for top companies in any industry and are now out beating the street to find a new paycheck.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SuperSneak
|
 |
In the land of the one-eyed
Jun 2000 time: 21:26
|
|
This one I enjoy particularly because one of the men in question in this article was the Head Vampire at my former employer's HQ. I say former, because some pointy-headed ghoul in Accounting sold back my plant's main consumeable resource (electricity) on the open market during Enron's power shenanigans.
They then used the profits to mothball and "disemploy" the chlorine plant I worked for. The average tenure there was @20 years--most of the employees had no translatable skills or education.
The severance was so generous (though hardly recompense for a livlihood and benefits) that you just knew some corporate thespian was probably flying over you in a golden jet right now, pissing Cristal out the window and throwing feces-stained $100 bills in your direction.
quote: Jean-Marie Messier has secured a multimillion-pound payoff from Vivendi Universal, despite devoting a section of his autobiography to attacking large severance packages for fired executives.
Mr Messier, whose departure will be rubber-stamped at a board meeting today, is reported to have received a golden goodbye worth £11.5m.
It is an abrupt about-turn by the group's former chief executive, who slammed compensation payments for sacked bosses in his book, Moi-Meme Maitre Du Monde [Myself, Master Of The Universe], published two years ago.
He berated Philippe Jaffre, former chief executive of oil giant Elf-Aquitaine, for securing a £19m payoff in the wake of the merger with Total Fina.
"The possibility of being fired... is a part of the normal risks inherent to the job of CEO. My contract has no such clause. And I pledge never to negotiate with my board. You can't have your cake and eat it, too - stock options to build your wealth and a parachute in case things turn out badly," he wrote.
Mr Messier will lose the £11.4m New York apartment bought for him by Vivendi last year, according to the Wall Street Journal Europe.
The payoff is equivalent to three times Mr Messier's salary and bonus last year, although he is believed to need the money to pay off loans taken out to buy Vivendi stock. |
Don't the investors complain about this crap? Does anyone wonder why the economy is sinking? The extremely wealthy have pulled their huge money out of the pot already, while the middle class got hung out to dry, convinced by insincere advisors that they should "hang in there".
Thank God I didn't have money to invest before. The losses seem staggering for the average investor, while the big winners cashed out and walked away, taking millions of dollars from failed ventures as their prize for destroying the market.
Last edited by SuperSneak on 28-02-2003 at 13:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
come on baby eat the rich
lalalala these sons of a *****.
having only read the initial thread opening post I'd comment that high wages are grundily ok but it's when they start gaining power to influence politics in a serious manner that it gets really infuriating.
of course that's le monde we're living in.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Examples from my country are too numerous to mention.
Particularly in what regards the nefarious and morbid relationship between rich CEOs and the government and the not so transparent competition assignments for building public works.
When there is saying that one of the biggest companies in Greece and the largest telecommunications equipment company in the Balkans will collapse if the government changes, you get the idea.
The nexus is unhealthy. Of course every ****er can have a huge company if it's build and it depends on its sick relationship to state funds no matter how much it proclaims that it is "private".
Of course that's not what you asked but I had to get it off my chest.
Hence is the state of affairs in Greece, sometimes it reminds the french national - social corporate structure. There are positives and negatives.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Has anyone here read Arianna Huffington's, "Pigs at the Trough"? It is full of tales of CEO's pirating from their corporations, bilking the employees and shareholders out of billions, by taking interest free loans and not paying them back among other things. It is a very good read if anyone is interested. Warning, this book is infuriating. Only the most jaded corporate apologists will be apathetic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Provost Harrison
|
 |
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000 time: 05:26
|
|
One name and one company: Bart Brecht, chief executive of Reckitt Benckiser, the company I temp for, they make products such as Gaviscon, Dettol, Lemsip, Haze, Finish, etc, etc...
Last year, Mr Brecht made a staggering £8 million pounds in total. Yet the people on the workfloor are harder pushed than ever, not having enough people to do the jobs because of the redundancies they are making. 50 people are being laid off yet people are stressed like crazy on the floor. 50 people each averaging an income of £20000 a year after everything paid. That is £1 000 000 a year. So the CEO's wage last year would keep those people in work for 8 years. Sickening, truly sickening.
And he had the cheek to tell employees that they should be more 'enthusiastic'...not all employees get the best part of 10 million quid a year, he can be enthusiastic. And all he has done is laid people off, cut corners left right and centre, made the average worker's life a misery and just thrown money at advertising (I mean, have you seen the number of adverts on at peak times for Lemsip or Dettol or Haze nowadays? Not cheap).
Yet in reality these overpaid fat cats don't have a clue what the job really involves, they spout their rhetoric and their management speak which really has no foundation with the shop floor worker whatsoever.
Down with the fat cats 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OneFootInTheGrave
|
 |
Kuzelj
Nov 2000 time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Princess Carly Fiorina only got piffling $2.9 million bonus
The stinginess of a print company
By Adamson Rust: Friday 28 February 2003, 10:51
FOR SERVICES TO the manufacturers of pink slips, for increasing shareholder value, and for backing Intel to the hilt, the compensation committee at HP has awarded Carly Fiorina, the firm's CEO, a piffling $2.9 million bonus in 2002, surely a sign of the miserly times we're in. [You should know all about that, Ed.]
The meagre extent of the bonus for the Princess was revealed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEX) yesterday.
She got the really very pitifully small bonus because Princess Heloise had additional responsibilities in 2002.
During the financial year 2002, the Princess did not exercise any share options.
She only has a miserable 4.6 million shares too. How stingy can HP get, we ask?
Her pay was frozen at $1 million during the financial year, because of the prevailing winds of economic change.
It's simply not good enough. µ |
OK I have to retract the whole 70million thing as that must be long term bonus, last year she only earned a 2.9 million bonus for making 15000 + people redundant...
Please bare in mind that the employees salaries are frozen for the second year running. ... just some top dogs can get the pay rises or some " bonuses" v... heh... I guess she is one of them...
And please note that her pay was frozen too as was everyone elses ... (at 1 million a year )
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|