 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
I predict it will be alot better than sodomy, though I never tried it. Just the idea...:barf:
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Seeker
|
 |
London Ontario
Jan 1970 time: 00:26
|
|
It's not new, it's even on video, has been for a long time.
Pros:
It's longer and epic. You don't have to look at Sting in a thong. There is no 'Battle Carousel' thingy for the Emperor.
Cons:
The costuming department was on drugs. The new Leto Atredies is awful. The old Baron, and the old Giedi Prime, was a lot more awful and beastly. The new Harkonnens are too cuddly.
It's less psychedelic. The motivations are more straigthforward, liberate the people, black and white. The don't delve too far into the direction of Paul's increasing inhumanness, or the ecology of Dune, or the brutal lifestyle of the Fremen. In the movie, the Fremen are just simple desert warriors oppressed by bad guy.
In conclusion, sometimes saying less is more. I felt the original was more blurry-edged, more 'Herberty'.
Of course, neither really captured the book, with its religious speculations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
I hope it's not as campy as the first Dune miniseries.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
I think Vesayen is talking about the new "Children of Dune" miniseries that is coming out. It covers the second dune book.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DetroitDave
The original dune movie was great for me visually, (almost perfect IMHO). But the novel's plot was so hacked up that it was virtually impossible to follow if you hadn't read the book.
The mini-series is the other way around. It follows the book much better, but the whole look and color scheme is too stark and underwhelming |
I agree with you perfectly. If you could combine the two, it would be the perfect Dune movie.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Seeker
It's not new, it's even on video, has been for a long time.
Pros:
It's longer and epic. You don't have to look at Sting in a thong. There is no 'Battle Carousel' thingy for the Emperor.
Cons:
The costuming department was on drugs. The new Leto Atredies is awful. The old Baron, and the old Giedi Prime, was a lot more awful and beastly. The new Harkonnens are too cuddly.
It's less psychedelic. The motivations are more straigthforward, liberate the people, black and white. The don't delve too far into the direction of Paul's increasing inhumanness, or the ecology of Dune, or the brutal lifestyle of the Fremen. In the movie, the Fremen are just simple desert warriors oppressed by bad guy.
In conclusion, sometimes saying less is more. I felt the original was more blurry-edged, more 'Herberty'.
Of course, neither really captured the book, with its religious speculations. |
No, the scifi channel made a movie on the dune book 2 years ago, NEXT WEEK a NEW MOVIE based on Children of Dune is coming out on the sci-fi channel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
Err...what happened to "Dune Messiah"? Or are they combining the two?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
I think they are combining em.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
If it's as bad as the last Dune mini-series, I'm won't upset that I don't have cable. Poor acting ruined it. Again, as with David Lynch's movie, the only redeeming factor in the show was the actor for Baron Harkonnen character. |
As bad as the Dune mini was, although I must give them an "A" for effort, I thought the Baron Harkonnen they used was particularly bad. Too campy over-the-top.
I seem to remember him looking into the camera and spouting Shakespeare or something similar at the end of all his scenes, with his nephews campily brooding in the background. Just bad.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|