 |
|  |
 |
|
Ghostbear
|
|
I spent $50 for MOO3, how much griping does that entitle me too? Probably an infinite amount until I get another game to take the pain away.
The article doesn't jibe with the arrogance they showed during those months as the timeline slipped and slipped.
The point that annoys me the most is them whining that no one took charge of the design.
I think the only real hope for MOO 3 is if it could become another SE IV community. However, SE IV does have repeated patches, not just modding.
And, like with SE IV Gold, there has to be more chances for the developers to make some $$$$.
I would pay for MOO 3 Gold, if it were a major upgrade.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ray K
|
|
Allen, TX
Nov 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asmodean
Sure, they're worried about breaking other things. In a piece of software as complex as MOO3, changing one pice of the code may well have adverse effects on other parts of the program. This doesn't mean that the game is flawed, though. It merely means that with millions of lines of code, even small changes can have unpredictable results.
Asmodean |
= poor design.
They held the game back several months for QC, changed the AI at the last minute and then released that change without testing?
I have no problem with people who like MOO3 and defend it (different strokes...), but defending QS for releasing a game that they admit is flawed is just silly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|