 |
|  |
 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
It really doesn't matter much. There are, what, some 70,000 left here, most of which are absent most of the time anyway (in Yugoslavia/Afghanistan/Gulf region etc) and this way can't raise our economy significantly. |
Obviously the German economy will not collapse if the US troops pull out entirely, but some quick calculations indicate that we're talking about 14 billion USD year for the German economy. Thats not insignificant by any means.
EDIT: I found some other numbers that said that NATO costs us 90bn USD/yr. Since 70% of that force is stationed in Germany that would be something around 60bn USD (Of course not all of that money would flow directly into the German economy).
quote: The big cut already was in the early nineties, when the occupation of Germany ended and the US forces were reduced from several hundred thousands to the mentioned 70,000 NATO contingent. Mind you, that time it was Germany, who asked the US forces to leave. So the economical drawback couldn't really hurt much. |
What 'occupation of Germany' was that?
quote: What concerns the upcoming complete withdrawal of the US forces... well, you are overestimating our interest. It's not that we're saying "Holy ****, now that will hurt us severely!" . Neither will we dance in the streets. The reaction most likely will be "So the Americans pull their forces out. And what else did happen?" |
Just like to point out that as of this time there are no official plans to withdraw the troops from Germany http://idsnews.com/story.php?id=14716.
Hopefully, the other Germans will feel just as you do.
Last edited by SpencerH on 10-03-2003 at 19:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:26
|
|
This split on Iraq predated Bush for a while. Clinton just didn't have the balls to push it.
And it certainly is not something anyone who wanted to be considered an ally would do.
That's precisely right. France wants to stand up to the US and create a counterbalance to our power. Guess what? That's not what allies do to each other.
Bush made clear that he believed that this was a vital interest of the United States and a clear threat against the United States. Allies don't fly into Africa to rally opposition to your policies on it.
Overall, the US is in no danger of becoming hated throughout the world. The coalition for this operation is quite large, with or without the UN. The UN is largely irrelevant for the US (not for the UK, perhaps). Perhaps some icing on the cake.
Last edited by DanS on 10-03-2003 at 20:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
Dan, I don't see how this, or anything, could "help France counterbalance our power."
I think it's the oil deal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:26
|
|
Believe it or not, Lancer. That's the way they look at it.
I think we should punish France for working against us on what we believe to be a threat against the US and on what is clearly not a French vital interest. Don't know how, but we should be working up a list...
Look at your best ally UK at the time. And it's not governments, but people, who'll feel hatred.
Opposition is not hatred. Even anti-Americanism isn't hatred. Don't read too much into it.
Last edited by DanS on 10-03-2003 at 20:25
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
Dan, are you personally boycotting French goods?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
Yes, I have the same problem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:26
|
|
SR, you'll buy it, so will I. It will be cheap too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
They don't have to fight. They don't have to send units.
They also do not need to stand in the way and throw a huge hissy fit over it..
It is the US taxpayer that is paying the bills to keep the lid on Saddam. Should they have to do that forever before they say, pfft... strike three, you're out?
And like it or not, the US administration links Saddam to their current crusade in the aftermath of 9/11. You may not see it. I may not see it, clearly. However, they see a link. It was a very large miscalculation on the part of the French and Germans to have got in front of that train. And it certainly is not something anyone who wanted to be considered an ally would do. |
NYE, This captures the essence of the problem. On its face, it does not appear that French and German vital interests are involved in maintaining Saddam in power. However, the US has stated that US (and even UK) vital interests are involved. Under these circumstances, one should at a minimum expect allies to defer to the judgment of their ally even if they disagreed with the policy.
Henry Kissinger said as much Saturday in an interview. He said that the current situation will call for a fundamental reexamination of our alliances. He also expects there to be a period of very cool relations between the US and France and Germany.
Rumsfeld is already talking about redeploying our army out of Germany.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Dan:
"The US believes this is in its vital national interests."
Which less than 20 % on this side of the pond can even remotely understand. And I'm not talking about disarming Iraq, but about the Bush admin being hellbent on regime change, war or/and occupation.
What is the vital US interest in that?
"It's not in France's vital national interests either way."
That the US does not claim a right to at its pleasure, in violation of the UN charter, dispose of governments could be seen as a vital french interest. At least easier to understand than the supposed vital interest of the US.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Allies don't do this sort of thing."
Oh please. The US is working against the EU whereever it can, now I just need to see the EU as our vital interest.
Also, Allies consider each other's opinions. The Bush admin has refused even to hear, not to mention listen.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|