 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
i didn't want it before, and i still don't want it
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JamesH
|
|
I wanted the game before and still want it.
the major concerns i have are over the AI (which will be fixed i presume) and the fact that its a "deep strategy" game that in fact is quite easy to beat because the ai runs it for you.
i think, however that as the AI gets tougher it will be harder to win just by sitting back and pressing end turn, so im as keen as ever to dive in to the MOO experience.
Last edited by JamesH on 12-03-2003 at 01:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Chronus
|
|
Well, I voted for "Wanted it but now I won't buy it" but that doesn't quite explain it.
I never played a game of MOO (any version) so I wasn't looking forward to buying the game. But then, I saw it in the store and it was like "gee, I haven't bought a game in awhile" so I almost bought it. I decided to wait, came here to see what was going on, was horrified at the posts and reviews, and finally decided not to buy it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chronus
Well, I voted for "Wanted it but now I won't buy it" but that doesn't quite explain it.
I never played a game of MOO (any version) so I wasn't looking forward to buying the game. But then, I saw it in the store and it was like "gee, I haven't bought a game in awhile" so I almost bought it. I decided to wait, came here to see what was going on, was horrified at the posts and reviews, and finally decided not to buy it. |
Interesting perspective. I had only played MOO2, and I was one of the few 4x fans who wasn't that impressed with it. I think I only played through one complete game. It just didn't thrill me--felt kinda hollow.
However, I was excited about MOO3 until I read all the horrible reviews and player comments. So I'm gonna avoid it. I may reconsider once a patch is released if it makes a noticeable difference, but I don't foresee that as being too likely.
It's also interesting that, of the votes so far, nobody who had previously not wanted the game now wants it. I think that speaks volumes...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:26
|
|
I didn't vote -- there's no "I wanted it, but am now undecided" option. Enough criticisms have come out that I'm taking a wait-and-see approach. The first patch or two will make up my mind. Civ3 didn't really get playable until about the third patch went by, now I finally find myself playing it more often (though still tweaking what I consider some flawed default rules).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
swordsman1612
|
|
I wanted it before, badly. As it is now, I'll wait to see how much the patch helps single player, and how GalCiv turns out to be.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ubergeek
|
 |
St. Paul, MN USA
Feb 2000 time: 23:26
|
|
I voted Wanted it before, but won't buy it now because of the many horrific reviews the game has garnered. I never played MoO in any previous incarnation, but I was really getting excited about this one. From what I'd read along the development process, it sounded as though they were taking the game in new and exciting directions; unfortunately, much of that new direction was abandoned along the way, and what's left doesn't look at all impressive.
So instead I finally sprung for Civ III: PTW (for the new civs, units, etc., not for multiplayer, since I don't ever use multiplayer) and will buy GalCiv when that comes out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:26
|
|
I voted bananas. I am waiting for an ai patch to be criticised here before I decide myself. If the ai cannot defend itself it is not worth buying, and GalCiv looks like it will be a better buy for me.
I'd have bought MOO3 whatever the critics if IFPs had been in, just to see how it turned out to be, but now I am inclined not to buy it, unless the ai is a challenge and you don't lose because someone in a senate you never heard of has won a vote.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
pg
|
|
i was interested but after the complaints i'm 99% sure i won't like it. many of flames i could probably have written myself if i had bought moo3. the article where the devs admit the game is messed up is pretty amazing. i don't know how you could want to buy it after reading that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MariOne
|
 |
Erewhon in Neverland
May 1999 time: 06:26
|
|
DESPITE the bad reviews I read on this forum, I still plan to buy it.
I was of course interested in it, although not exactly desperately craving for it.
I only had a partial experience with MoO2, got it very late from a bargain bin (actually Bingmang GIFTED it to me, including overseas shipping!) and never got very experienced in it, as SMAC hogged almost all my playing time in the last 4 years.
I am not really inclined to let a NEW game take hold of all my free time, at the moment. For this reason, I wasn't planning to get it anyway before Easter.
I WILL buy it anyway, because:
- I like to OWN such classic milestones, 4x TBS being almost the only genre I play
- I NEED to get hold of the original US version, BEFORE it gets out of stock as it gets replaced in local shops by the dreaded localised version which I *loathe* ON PRINCIPLE.
Hell, I think I even ended to buy CtPII but then never even unwrapped it! 
___
BTW, partially contradicting what I told above, I had played for a while the SE IV demo, last year.
Not exactly breathtaking, but passable.
Well, on a whim, I resolved to purchase SE IV Gold online, last week, 40$ + 20$ shipping , and last night, just wanting to walk thru a quick rehearsal, I stood up till 5 am.... 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|