 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
IBM sold their HDD division.
It pretty much doesn't matter these days. Seagate used to have a reputation of being unreliable. However, since the old high-ended makers (Cheetah, Micropolis, etc.) are all gone, you don't have much of a choice.
Just check out things like MTBF (mean time between failure), tranfer rate, seek time, buffer size, etc. |
UR, Cheetah is a Seagate disk drive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
--"And what brand would you buy?"
What are you after, and how much can you spend? ATA, SATA, or SCSI? Is heat a problem (ie. are you already overclocking)?
Personally, I'd probably go with the latest Seagate Barracuda drive, just because they're pretty quiet. Not the top of the performance charts, but I don't do anything that requires the kind of disk I/O that would make me notice the difference.
--"Well, Seagate uses "Design for Six Sigma.""
On which drives? Their consumer and enterprise lines will not be the same. I'd expect them to do this for their SCSI line, but doubt they do it on their IDE line right now (seeing as how they've dropped the warranty coverage to 1 year like basically all of the drive manufacturers have).
Wraith
It said, "Insert disk #3," but only two will fit!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wraith
--"And what brand would you buy?"
What are you after, and how much can you spend? ATA, SATA, or SCSI? Is heat a problem (ie. are you already overclocking)?
Personally, I'd probably go with the latest Seagate Barracuda drive, just because they're pretty quiet. Not the top of the performance charts, but I don't do anything that requires the kind of disk I/O that would make me notice the difference.
--"Well, Seagate uses "Design for Six Sigma.""
On which drives? Their consumer and enterprise lines will not be the same. I'd expect them to do this for their SCSI line, but doubt they do it on their IDE line right now (seeing as how they've dropped the warranty coverage to 1 year like basically all of the drive manufacturers have).
Wraith
It said, "Insert disk #3," but only two will fit! |
Wraith, Design for Six Sigma is required for all design centers. Six Sigma itself is required for every director and above.
All I suggest is that this has to translate into higher quality than one would normally achieve. Whether it is higher than other drive company's products depends on their own design and manufacturing quality requirements.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
can't beat the WD SE drives with the 8MB buffers!!!!!!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
For IDE drives, I'd probably go with Western Digital.
I've only used SCSI for years now (currently running Ultra320 SCSI in 10k and 15k RPM drives, and I have them in a RAID 5, so I don't sweat failures), and I've never had a hardware failure on any IBM, Seagate or Quantum SCSI drive, from SCSI-2 on to Ultra320 SCSI.
The most hours I put on any drive were probably 20-30,000. Right now, between various comps, I'm running 15 Ultra320 and 2 Ultra160 drives, with between 3800 and 19,000 hours on them (the high hours on the Ultra160's, which are now relegated to an office comp). None of these, nor my SCSI adapters (all Adaptec 29xx, 29xxx and 39xxx models) have ever failed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|