 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: It strikes me that giving major support to Shi'ites in Iraq would be just about the best way to deal with Islamic conflict against the US. Watch the Al-Qaidr recruitments evaporate. |
That's probably true. But it would totally undermine the anti-Iranian policy. And it'd guarantee a nasty civil war in Iraq. Not something I'd expect to happen.
Edit:
On second thought, I don't know if it would hurt Islamic terrorism against the US all that much. You might finally have the US on the side of popular revolt, but the propaganda value of that is limited. On the other hand, you might throw some of the Iraqi Sunnis into the hands of al-Qaeda et al. Plus, a Shia Iraq would de-stabilize Saudi Arabia, causing an even more extremist regime replacing House Saud.
Last edited by Ramo on 15-03-2003 at 15:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: What makes you so convinced that inactivity, or your undescribed "smart sanctions" won't just carry on resulting in the annual deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis? |
I'm not convinced. I think it's worth a shot, and the gov't can't screw this up too badly.
As for a description, the sanctions should be much less stringent and we should deal with Iraqi individuals instead of the state.
quote: Because if the replacement regime looks worse, we go in for Round 2. |
We will? The propaganda focus has always been about WMD's (which are irrelevent anyways), not human rights. Human rights conditions provide a greater extra casus belli, it was never that important. But after Saddam is replaced, the US has proven it's point - once you're a *****, you're always a *****, so they'll go home.
I doubt the replacement regime would be worse per se, but that that it would be comparable, but the situation the country would be in would be more objectionable than Saddam's current situation, thus the the country will be worse.
quote: How is that any different from the present? |
The Sunni have all the power in Iraq. The Shia have numbers (and Iranian help). Give more leverage to the Shia, and you even the situation some more. If you give power to the Sunni (as long as they're effective at crushing dissent), you insure that the civil war wouldn't really get started.
Last edited by Ramo on 15-03-2003 at 14:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002 time: 15:26
|
|
What do you mena by "what has he done"? Do you mean what has he done to make himself be invaded, or what has he done to his people or country?
The first is why we're invading him.
The second is why we should be.
Fair enough?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
ramo the US could do a lot more if it wasnt yelled at every second it was there by ppl screaming anti imperialism at the top of their lungs. ur right it takes longer than what we will probably spend. but only out of compromise. because imperialism is a surprisingly effective catch phrase. ppl hear it and its like insta protest.
and I don't make idiotic generalizations. there are a very few # of protestors who know **** about ****. the vast majority are simply marching under "iraq civilians will die" or the US is a meanie. it'd be a massive generalization to go the other way and say that all the protestors are in the least educated or have thought it out in any significant non infantile way.
my direction is simply taking the statistical majority and making an observation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
I am sorry, but when I see all these "look how horrid Saddam is..hate him, hate him.." I get sick.
Oh yeah, Saddam is the only brutal dictator in the world, the only one that kills innocents, the only one that tortures..blah, blah, blah.
In 1941, hitler was certainly doing thins just as 'creative" with human pain, yet on Dec 6, 1941, 70% or more of American swould have said..Go to War? hell no!
Do you guys hate the Leadership of the Hutu militias who slaughtred 1,000,000 directly (I am not counting those that died in wars..most of the people we claim Saddam is fully responsible for killing died in the Iran-Iraq war, a war with two sides. Peace could have been had after just a few years, before the Iranins under Khomeini decided that beating back Saddam was not enough..that they sought regime change, and thus the war goes on until 1988 and not 1982-3) in 3 months? yes, I will save the endless posts about suffereing, about people hacked to death, packed into churches and burned, or the story about how all the dogs of the country had to be killed cuase they were getting fat of corpses. A few of them are on trial now in Kenya..but I have never ehard anyone profess hatred for them. Hell, in the Us we don't even know their names.
Oh, and what about regimes like the Usbekistan regime, one of our new great allies with a cult of personality just as bad, no, worse than Saddams in which people are disappeared and so forth? Do you guys hate them?
Give me a f*cking break! Saddam is a barbarous, criminal butcher, no doubt..but the reason Americans' "hate" him have little to do with that, as it is clear we are more than willing to overlook such things when other issues are at stake. All the bastard commentator today screaming about how Bad saddam is: same azsholes that in 1994 were arguing how Rwanda was not "genocide", but something else, and hence the US and UN had no obligations to do anyting about it.
I f*king hate such hypocrasy! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
its depressing that u expect us to do everything about everything or nothing. kinda extreme dont u think? how about when our morality and our interests coincide that u allow us to take a stand?
instead of spitting some inane hypocrisy talk at us. when in reality ALL THESE things moraly outrage u and u do absolutely nothing about any of them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
chegitz ur so missing a matter of scale. yes the US isnt pure and innocent. but to compare the US gov't w/ saddam hussein is showing a complete and total lack of perspective and scale.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|