 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:26
|
|
I also don't get the panic over the supposed "slow" pace of the war.
If the coalition had sat in Kuwait and bombed Iraq for for a few weeks to soften them up, no one would have questioned this slow pace. Instead thay marched in and took a sizeable chunk of Iraq in days. THis action may have prevented major ecological damage in the south
I presume that the forces in north west and south Iraq are growing and that Iraqi forces are being lessened through bombings. A slowdown in the offensive is not only to be expected but it is probably a necessity for maintenance, resupply and rest. I figure it gives the fist a greater punch when it gets going again.
My question is what will the war planners do when the forces reach Bagdad. How do you fight in an urban environment against a foe that relishes using trickery while avoiding civilian casualties. I expect Iraqi emplacements in every hospital, apartment building, seniors home . . . .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
I also don't get the panic over the supposed "slow" pace of the war.
If the coalition had sat in Kuwait and bombed Iraq for for a few weeks to soften them up, no one would have questioned this slow pace. Instead thay marched in and took a sizeable chunk of Iraq in days. THis action may have prevented major ecological damage in the south. |
Ecological, economic, and humanitarian. That was a good move, but we should have written off Turkey earlier and repositions 4 ID so that they were ready to move up the road as soon as 3 ID cleared it.
quote:
I presume that the forces in north west and south Iraq are growing and that Iraqi forces are being lessened through bombings. A slowdown in the offensive is not only to be expected but it is probably a necessity for maintenance, resupply and rest. I figure it gives the fist a greater punch when it gets going again. |
The problem is that people equate the pace of the offensive with the amount of noise, or reports of body count. The maneuver aspect of offensive operations is even more important - if you can maneuver a defender out of ground of his choosing, it's as good if not better than blasting him out of it.
The latest is that US forces took a bridge over the Euphrates at al Hindiyah, which is directly astride the line from Karbala to al Hillah that was being held by IRG Medina. So the Medina *******s have either been forced to retreat with the nearest bridges some 20 miles north, or they're cut in half, with neither half having the ability to link up with the other.
quote:
My question is what will the war planners do when the forces reach Bagdad. How do you fight in an urban environment against a foe that relishes using trickery while avoiding civilian casualties. I expect Iraqi emplacements in every hospital, apartment building, seniors home . . . . |
The difficult question will be the reaction of the Iraqi populace outside Baghdad. Most of the "resistance" is inspired by force and fear of the Baath/SRG/ISSS elements, so when Baghdad is encircled, those elements have to make a choice whether to try to get back to Baghdad, or try to operate on their own. The perception of the Iraqis outside Baghdad that Saddam really will be gone this time should make a huge difference in how coalition forces choose to operate in Baghdad itself. This is one case where, like it or not, the plan has to be developed on the fly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:26
|
|
Yes, this is an interesting phase. It looks to me like it's a methodical push. A lot of repositioning. Allowing IRG units into the blast zones. Keeping the IRG out of areas where they aren't welcome.
Interestingly, the IRG captured in Hindiyah were said to be from the Nebuchadnezzar Division normally stationed in Tikrit.
Last edited by DanS on 31-03-2003 at 23:10
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
In GW 1, there was a major engagement between Marine armor (M60A3's) and regular Iraqi armor (T-55 + T72) at the Kuwait airport, however that was a meeting engagement.
The Marines are too light in armor and arty to really want to have a go at dug in armor. They can do it, but with unnecessarily high casualties, and it's a poor utilization of the USMC's capabilities.
So far, Karbala is still XVIII AC country, since 3 ID is a part of XVIII AC, not V Corps.
With 82 ABD fighting around Najaf at last report, V Corps is essentially not accounted for at this point. |
I think the plan was to have the Brits armor spearhead the right flank. Since they are tied up at Basra, the 4th ID may be necessary. The Marine will advance only to open the route and secure the supply lines allowing for a rapid 4th ID advance on the right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|