 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
You still do not answer my question. I think (in answer to yours) that he would resign before he would tell a lie of such magnitude for Bush or anyone else.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:26
|
|
Perhaps Lincoln... but if the facts are so compelling, how come most of what the Bush admin releases is either fabricated, outdated and plagerized, or missing important facts. I mean, I believe probably has something stashed away somewhere. But why can't the US just lay evidence on the table and say, here it is. Instead, I hear political rhetoric, and like you, I don't trust much of anything politicians say. And frankly, I don't believe Bush's assertion that inspections and sanctions aren't working in the containment of Saddam.
Also, I don't know if I mentioned this or not, but I saw Daschle's little response. This man is a little weasel with nothing relevant or intelligent to say.
EDIT: I understand that insulting 'Poly posters is wrong. I wasn't aware I'm not to insult members of the US government... sorry...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Well Sava, at least we agree on Daschle. Did your see Powell's presentation before the UN btw (about a month ago)?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Well don't be dripping any of it around here...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Sometimes a politician has to make a choice between his integrity towards the public and his loyalty to political friends / allies. Most politicians have to say something they deeply disagree with at some time of their career, because they are speakers for an organization they do not fully control.
It is very possible Powell accepted to lie in order to keep the cohesion of the admin. |
It is also very possible that he told the truth. He has no past history of lying that I know of. And he opposed Bush in the beginning and even stated at one point that he would likely not be a member of his next administration if he is reelected. A change came over him. I think it is because of the evidence that he uncovered. I think the burden of proof is on the people who think he is a liar. Where is your evidence of his past lies?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
The history of United States throughout the twentieth century shows that the United States has propped up dictatorships during the Cold War as part of the ideological war against communism.
United States was definitely not promoting democracy. |
Yes they did prop up anti-commie dictatorships. No they weren't promoting democracy.
They did this because they felt it necessary, not because they wanted to nor because they liked the regimes involved.
Now they don't need to do this any longer and can do something about them, particularly given the incentive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NikolajRomanov
Russland, Russland über alles !
Für Gott, Zar und Vaterland ! |
If you want to praise mother Russia, at least select a Czar that was not a total loser. Peter the Great would be a better choice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
NikolajRomanov
|
 |
Germany
Feb 2003 time: 05:26
|
|
@ Sir Ralph: It was intended to be a little bit funny 
I like (more or less) funny combinations
My Palpatine[GE] acc @Starcraft is described with :
Imperator Palpatine sagt: "Wenn dir jemand auf die linke Wange schlägt halte auch die rechte hinn"
A free translation is:
Palpatine says: If you are hurt by anyone don't hurt him back.
@ Lord Merciless
quote: If you want to praise mother Russia, at least select a Czar that was not a total loser. Peter the Great would be a better choice. |
In fact he was a political looser but I like him because of his personal qualitys. I recommend you to read more about the person Nikolaj II. rather than about the politician (no offend against you in my opinion he was a overall looser to until I have read more about himself)
If I had to choose a Czar who was (more or less) politicaly successfull I would choose Alexander II.
LONG LIVES THE CZAR
Pro Patria et Gloria
Attachment: nicholas.jpg
This has been downloaded 34 time(s).
Last edited by NikolajRomanov on 19-03-2003 at 17:43
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
Well welcome to Apolyton comrad Nikolaj! We can use a different point of view here. The same old arguments become rather boring after a while.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|