 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Edited by Ming...
Next time, put it in English... or you will be restricted.
Last edited by Ming on 18-03-2003 at 22:42
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ellestar
|
|
Russian Federation, Moscow
Feb 2003 time: 08:26
|
|
Edited by Ming...
Next time, put it in English... or you will be restricted.
Last edited by Ming on 18-03-2003 at 22:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:26
|
|
Ellestar: eto tipa takoi ritual. Kajdi raz kogda novichok pribvayet v "Off-Topic", mi yego nazivayem "DL", is sovershayem ritualni tanez. "DL" oboznaochayet dvoynoi schet, yakobi kakoyto drugoy chlen foruma zapisivayetsya yeche raz, dlya togo shotbi sozdat yeche odnu lichnost, ( Vosnovnom dlya togo shtobi nadela shorohu ).
Vosnovnom mi eto v shutku.
 
Translation ( for spiffor ) :
Ellestar: this is a ritual, of sorts. Everytime a newbie arrives in the Off-Topic, we call him a DL, and start a ritual dance. DL means Double Login, supposedly some other forum member signs up another time, to create another identity. ( usually to make some noise ).
Generally, It's just a joke.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I don't know if there will be war or not if Saddam leaves. I'm oriented towards thinking there will be no war, but only some localized clashes with the few troops that'll remain loyal to Saddam, and some radical Kurds / Shiites.
If Saddam leaves, the US and the Bushies would have reached almost all its objectives :
- getting rid of the former puppet regime to install a new one
- legitimizing this whole charade, Bush would earn a huge support in the US population
- prove that the US still is the boss
- have a reliable supply of oil in prediction of the incoming tensions with Saudi Arabia (must finish these massive financing to terrorists)
- prove the chickenhawks were right, and that a big gun is more efficient than words.
However, two goals would have been left unfulfilled :
- explicitely showing the superiority of the US army on the field
- Have a full scale training, with the chance it provides to develop new strategies, and to see how those already thought are working : you rarely have the opportunity to wage a real war against a harmless enemy.
For these last two reasons, it is possible the Hawks find another pretext to declare war anyway, but that would be terrible for their image even among the US population and expansive, so it is unlikely.
However, it is obvious the US is going to invade. This here post was wondering if the US would invade all guns blazing or not, if Saddam leaves. |
I agree, well written
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
Kramerman, I wonder if Bush II can be objective in criticizing his Dad. Obviously, he cannot criticize Clinton on Iraq without also criticizing his Dad. Both are responsible, in part, for the mess we are in today.
I recall that, at the time, I thought it was good at a good idea to not take out Saddam, but the leave him in power as a buffer against Iran. However I did not count on Saddam, playing games with the disarmament program, the no-fly zones and continuing US involvement so many years later. Had I known in this at the time, I would have been among those Americans insisting that the war be renewed.
Hindsight? Monday morning quarterback? Clearly, both Republicans and Democrats share responsibility for what happened. Thank God that we elected George Bush and not Al Gore. If Al Gore had been elected, I can guarantee you that Saddam problem would not have been resolved during his administration, which may have extended to 2009. This is quite sufficient time for Saddam to acquire nuclear weapons and to threaten to use them to first force us to leave Kuwait and then to prevent a Desert Storm II when he later conquered Kuwait for a second time. Yes, Al Gore turned out to be an appeaser.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
I am worried about United States' position in today's world.
On 9/11 we lost 3,000 lives from terrorist attacks. Yet, in the past decades, Latin American countries and SE Asian countries have losted hundreds of thousands of lives from terrorist attacks. Some of these terrorist groups were trained by the CIA and the School of America.
So we wonder why post-9/11 sympathy had long runned thin.
And we're doing a great job in antagonizing our allies with our drum-beatings over upcoming war against Iraq. Yes, France has its own selfish interests in trying to prevent war against Iraq, but United States is also guilty of providing chemical weapons to Saddam Hueissen. After all, this is one of the dictators who was allied with the United States. In the past, United States has propped up dictatorships all across the world.
No one can predict how the chain of events will unfold, but I am sincerely worried about my country and our position in today's world.
The United States needs to stop sponsoring dictatorships in this world, and the United States needs to abolish all programs that train terrorist groups in other countries. I think these are the two main reasons why so many other countries are alienated by our actions |
What do you mean, "sponsor?"
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|