Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-PtW Democracy Game > C3PtWDG Legoland > Defense Analysis, 1200 BC
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 10:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Defense Analysis, 1200 BC Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Legoland Defense Analysis, 1200 BC
----------------------------------------------


Overview:
This report is inteded to give a run-down of the overall state of our military, it's ability to defend our lands, and some brief comparison with other known civilizations. I will not reiterate too much from the earlier analysis, but will instead focus on new developments.

Current Standing Forces:
4 - Warriors
1 - Archer
7 - Num. Mercs.
1 - Galley

Available Strat. Resources:
1 - Horse (connected next turn)
1- Iron (not yet connected, but will be shortly.)

Legopolis
Our capital is currently defended by 1 Num. Merc. Being well inland, and with easy access to three other cities, there is little change needed. However, Legopolis will make the perfect staging ground for any rapid response force in the north. This will be discussed further later in the report.

Panama
Panama is currently defended by 1 warrior. Panama is also our only city with a barracks. Furthermore, Panama also has both of our strat. resources within its borders. Basically, this makes Panama incredibly important. Fortunately, Panama is also a very difficult city to get to for any would-be invaders, so its current defenses are adequete.

In the near future, Panama will be an excellent training ground for our rapid-response forces, being able to produce veterans from the get-go. I would suggest that in the near future, Panama be devoted to producing several horsemen to form the core of our RR forces.

Jackson
Since the last report, Jackson has been reinforced with a 2nd Num. Merc. Being the likely landing point of any northern-approaching attackers, Jackson now has relatively strong defenses to deal with threats. Furthermore, once RRs are based in Legopolis, Jackson will be very easily reinforced.

RedBrick
Num. Merc. Jungle surroundings. Safe.

Farmerville
Currently only defended by an archer, I would like to see this city eventually get a Merc. of its own. However, that is not urgent as it is a very inland target. Farmerville's position makes it a perfect base of operations for a central RR force.

Forkmouth
Forkmouth is currently undefended. It will have a warrior in 4 turns, and a Num. Merc within 3 spaces if the need arises. Once the warrior is complete, I think it would be in our best interests to switch the warrior and the Merc. No use leaving a powerul defender on barb. sentry duty when a warrior will be available.

Karina
Soon to be settled, Karina will have a Merc. from the start. Karina will also have a road ready-made leading to it, greatly increasing the ability to reinforce it quickly. Once built, Karina will be the obvious base for southern RR forces.

Zargonia Bay
When built, Zargonia Bay will be a key in deterring any landings from the East. I would suggest having two Mercs based there as soon as possible, as well as a barracks when time permits.

Logville
Another key blockade against landings from southern Bob (read: RP), Logville shoud also have two Mercs in case of suprise landings.

Summary
Currently, our cities are well defended, barring any overhwhelming invasion force, which I see as being unlikely in the short term. The more important issue is dealing with anyone who tries to settle our lands, or launches a limited suprise attack to try and cripple one of our cities. For this, I suggest we ready several Rapid Response Forces.

Operation Zephyr
Operation Zephyr calls for the deployment of three RR task forces based in three main cities, covering the three regions of Legos (Sharpe, this is essentially your plan also ) Region I would be the northern sector, with a base in Legopolis. Region II would be the central sector, based in Farmerville. Region III would be the southern lands, based out of Karina.

Each RR force would consist of, at minimum, three horsemen, with at least 1 veteran in each squad to begin with. Economically speaking, we currently have forces of 21 units, out of an allowed 24. Of those, 2 units are settlers, which will soon be converted to cities, giving us a total of 19 units out of 32. One warrior pending gives us 20 out of 32. So, for the next round of cities, we have 12 units leeway on the support front. Hence, 9 horsemen will be no burden (under despotism.).

These RR forces will be able to reach any cities in their region within 1-2 turns (except Zargonia, which is currently 4 turns with no roads.). Other unsettled portions of the regions can be reached in 4 (except the Dyepatch Jungle, which, if someone really wanted to settle there, we could just send in heavier forces...). The only problem area is the far SW tip of Legos, which is currently very remote. Our next wave of settlers should focus on that area, as well as having a worker dispatched to begin roading. The only other problem area is Legos Minor, which is fortunately fairly inhospitable to settlement, save for a small area. If the need arises, a troop ship could quickly be dispatched from Panama, though I see this scenario as highly unlikely.

That concludes my analysis; I hope to hear all of your input on it soon.

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 12:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

My only contribution to this would be 4 ideas/proposals, for the medieval age:

1. As a general rule, even if not necesarily now, I'd like to see at least two mercenaries defending the eastern cities.
2. I love the Rapid Reaction Forces (knights -> cavalries), but once we can afford more military I'd like to have at least one Immediate Response Force (read Swordsman -> Medieval Infantry) in the most important border cities
3. To prevent landings and/or to ease the work of our brave soldiers, some bombardment units are a must, also in border cities (read - eastern coast, at least for a while). As annoying as they are when they miss (quite often), they are very-very good in large packs to weaken the enemy troops (including ships).
4. We must start building a fleet. A few ships patrolling our eastern coast could prevent a tentative landing on Legos.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 13:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Excellent job, ZargonX! You've got my vote as M.A.

I also consider a strong mounted force a must - it will help tremendously even with barbarians, with our road network relatively far-reaching, the operational range of RRF will be awesome.

I would use Panama as our veteran producing city for quite some time now. Let's make the best use out of those barracks over there. Mostly horsies with a Merc inserted here and there.

As for the navy... Tibi is right about that we need a navy... but I would consider RRF and Mercs even more urgent, as galleys attacking other galleys are - out of my experience - mostly losing galleys... Dunno about you, but my galleys always suck in fight. So, I would first make sure we are adequately defended on our mainland and only then go for an extensive naval boost.

Arty (catapults) are not to be oversought, that's for sure, but they would be about the same or lower priority as navy for me.

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 13:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by vondrack
As for the navy... Tibi is right about that we need a navy... but I would consider RRF and Mercs even more urgent, as galleys attacking other galleys are - out of my experience - mostly losing galleys... Dunno about you, but my galleys always suck in fight. So, I would first make sure we are adequately defended on our mainland and only then go for an extensive naval boost.

I didn't say I want a navy now, but eventually we will need one (but not galleys, I agree). I don't want galleys instead of horsemen or swords! Holy crap, I might be out of my mind, but not entirely (yet) My ideas were for a longer term, not immediate plans.

quote:
Arty (catapults) are not to be oversought, that's for sure, but they would be about the same or lower priority as navy for me.

Same as before. Not now, but I'd rather have 15 knights and 5 cannons than 20 knights; but the building order would be: 10 knights, then one cannon and one knights, alternatively (just an example). That was the idea.

Short/middle term plans are admitedly more important right now, but it doesn't hurt to know what we aim for. More attackers, more defenders, mobile forves, navy, artilleries, etc? I hope the picture has cleared a bit

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 16:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Tibi, sorry if I stepped on your toes.

I did not mean to say "I disagree with Tibi."
I meant "I agree with Tibi, too, viewing his ideas in this order of importance."



And btw, I fully agree with the approach you mentioned in the previous post - we need more of everything.

Sharpe is offline Sharpe
King
Ontario
May 1999
time: 00:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 16:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Excellent job, ZargonX! You've got my vote as M.A.


I hope this is a joke, as this is supposed to be a secret ballot.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 16:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by Sharpe
I hope this is a joke, as this is supposed to be a secret ballot.

Steve, please... you know I love you both.

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 18-03-2003 17:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by vondrack
Tibi, sorry if I stepped on your toes.

I did not mean to say "I disagree with Tibi."
I meant "I agree with Tibi, too, viewing his ideas in this order of importance."

I know, I responded only because I felt I was misunderstood.

Sharpe is offline Sharpe
King
Ontario
May 1999
time: 00:26
  Old Post 19-03-2003 04:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Oh sorry Radek - I meant to include a "puzzled" smiley at the end of my post. Without it, my reply sounded harsh when it intended to be more of a joke.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Apolyton Time is 00:26.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0438 seconds (87.90% PHP - 12.10% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net