 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: 18 March 2003
USA
Amnesty International Condemns Operation Liberty Shield; Criticizes Blanket Detentions for Asylum Seekers from Specific Countries
'Liberty from Unwarranted Detention is a Hallmark of a Free Society,' Organization Stresses
(Washington, DC) -- Amnesty International USA (AIUSA) today condemned the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) decision to enact Operation Liberty Shield, which mandates the detention of asylum seekers from Iraq and at least 33 other countries. The plan allows the DHS to detain "for the duration of their processing period" asylum applicants "from nations where al-Qaeda, al-Qaeda sympathizers, and other terrorist groups are known to have operated," according to today's Department of Homeland Security's announcement.
"Al-Qaeda sympathizers are known to have operated in many European countries, throughout the Middle East, and even in the United States itself," said Dr. William F. Schulz, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA. "Therefore, Operation Liberty Shield gives immigration authorities carte blanche to detain virtually all persons seeking asylum in the United States. Such new authority is far too blunt an instrument to use in an effort to protect Americans' security, and it is guaranteed to damage the liberties of everyone subjected to it."
Amnesty International recognizes the US government's obligation to protect its citizens and supports legitimate means of doing so. However, blanket detention of asylum seekers is also barred by international standards, which state that the detention of asylum seekers should normally be avoided and is justified only in limited cases prescribed by law. Governments have the burden of showing the necessity for detention of asylum seekers in prompt and fair individualized hearings before a judicial or similar authority.
"Operation Liberty Shield denies liberty to the victims of human rights abuse who come to our country seeking freedom," said Schulz. "Liberty from unwarranted detention is a hallmark of a free society. To name an operation that denies liberty to asylum seekers 'liberty shield' is Orwellian."
Operation Liberty Shield would authorize the detention of asylum seekers from these unnamed countries for the duration of the asylum procedure. "The asylum process usually takes months, sometimes years," said Bill Frelick, Director of AIUSA's Refugee Program. "As a result, traumatized people seeking our protection who have never committed a crime could find themselves in prisons and jails for months and months simply because they asked our country for asylum from persecution." |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
The fact is that young, male muslims who are here illegally make up the vast majority of those who have committed terrorist acts against the US. So it makes perfect sense to keep an eye on them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
Yep, every Moslem is a terrorist. They don't deserve freedom. |
Are you incapable of thinking of people as individuals?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
The danger of terrorism is definitely higher among muslims, you can't deny it.
Here's an article written by someone who attended a closed-door meeting of a muslim student association at a university near me:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/a...RTICLE_ID=31571
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Even our president said this is not the work of the Muslim people. Let me ask you a question... do you think the internment of the Japanese was correct? |
For your information, they were not interned, they were free to leave, as long as they stayed out of the exclusion zone on the west coast. Don't go believing popular myths my friend.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
This law detains without due process up EVERY asylum seeker from these countries. |
The group of people that are seeking asylum from those countries have a much higher probability of being terrorists, so I don't have a problem with them being detained. If they want to escape their country so badly they should go to the nearest safe haven. Why do they want to come to the US?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: The group of people that are seeking asylum from those countries have a much higher probability of being terrorists, so I don't have a problem with them being detained. |
In other words, you're a racist who doesn't care about freedom of Moslems. No need to explain.
quote: If they want to escape their country so badly they should go to the nearest safe haven. Why do they want to come to the US? |
Probably because they believed America would be a land of liberty and opportunity for them. Of course, they were misinformed.
quote: No, and if I were a Moslem seeking asylum I would probably try for another country. If you don't want to deal with our rules for immigration, don't come here. |
Ah, so it's their fault? What a bunch of loaded doublespeak...
quote: Ramo, If you put this to a vote of the American people, I can bet how the vote would come out.
I believe the average American is really concerned about terrorism.
I wonder what Tom Daschle says about this? |
How is this relevant?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|