 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Heresson
Yes, I am...
But I do not have to comment Russian anti-Polish blabling. |
Tell me Heresson, Is Poland already joined the anti-Iraq coalition?
When you are planing to start kissing of uncle Sam's as*?
Last edited by Serb on 23-03-2003 at 08:15
|
|
| |
|
|
|
gigapimp3001
|
|
The way I see it everybody hates everybody else on this stinking planet.
Brits are tea drinking queers, Frogs are unshaven stuck up gits, germans are nazis, russians are commie imperialist, Americans are arrogant capitilist imperialist, arabs are fanatics, christians are fantics, jews are fanatics, hindus are fanatics, chinese are mysterious easten devils, japanese are inhuman easten devils, africans are pathetic starving peasents, latinos are drug peddling banana republics refugees, the rich are exploting the poor, the poor are lazy idiots, intellectuals are queers, capitalists are steak eating tyrants............and the list goes on and on and on.
Somebody try and close this arguement because I just see us making the same old tired mistakes again and agian.............
and that makes me a sad panda 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:26
|
|
The weapon inspector where slow and surely diarming Iraq it might have take ayear or two. By going to war now we donot have the support of the UN and I hear that the roads behind our advanging forces are being mines with mine's. If we have to engauge in street fighting for Baghdad we can ecpect alot of our guying getting kill and Iraq might use chemical weapon in the city fighting. There are some Iraq people in the part of Iraq which are calling our soilder foreign devil right to their face trying to get our guy to do the wrong thing. There is than old saying that say" getting into war is easier but getting out is the hard part. " Look in Vietman it was very hard to America to leave without loseing
face or looking foolish for being into the Vietman mess in the
first place. We would need at least 300,000 to 600,000 man to occuprate Iraq for the next 20 year of so. Our total military right now is about 1 million man in the Army, navy, marine, and airforce.
I forgot our hight tech avangter in range and accurate fireing is null in city fighting as most fighting take place at
very close range.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001
time: 11:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by CharlesBHoff
The weapon inspector where slow and surely diarming Iraq it might have take ayear or two |
Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq. |
I know that Iraq was disarm already we have certain right wing idiot in our government who want to next invade Iran ,Syria, India, Pakistian, North Korea, China, Russia, and France. It easier to make and hide biowarfare factory than nuclear weapon factory. Any person with chemical knowlge can make chemical weapon with than simple lab but with than hight risk of killing himself.
I know Ming doesnot like people calling other people idiot but I realy question the wisdom of they preempty attack idear as it can lead to use makeing big mistake. Bush will not be reelectic by the America people.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Joseph
|
 |
Ca. USA
Feb 2000
time: 21:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Serb
Bush don't needed disarmed Iraq, because Iraq with ruined economy and defeated in 1991 military was already no threat to the world. Bush needed control over Iraq, while we are talking here, several exerts of US oil companies ALREADY expecting oil dwells in "liberated" territory of Iraq. |
Serb, I don't think Bush give a dam about Iraq oil, but he need a base for Iran. If he has a base in Iraq and Afghanistan, Iran is in the middle. Keep in mine Iran does not have the bomb yet, and now would be the best time to stop them before they get the bomb. Would you like Iran to have the bomb when they openly support terrorist and are just south of you, what a 1,000 miles (1600 kmt) or so. We know for sure that Al-Queda operate in Iran freely.
BTW I did want Saddam gone. I was hoping for a hearth attack. I'm not antiwar or pro-war. That may be hard for you to understand coming from me. But since we are there, I want minimal causalities on both our side and the Iraqi civilian side. For the Iraqi soldiers if they give up so be it (good), however for those who fight bye bye, see you in the next life.
Joseph
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Joseph
Not quite. Just Iran and North Korea for now. |
North Korea already have 30 to 40 250 kilotonne to 500 kilotonne nuclear weapon already with than 12000 to 14000 miles missile to deliver then to their target.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002
time: 06:26
|
|
The UN will never kick US and UK. If they did that they wouldn't be able to continue stealing (sorry, I mean getting) all that money from them.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001
time: 06:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kramerman
Serb, if you still think this war is about oil, i roll my eyes at you  |
This war is sure not all about oil, but is partly about oil. The US need a reliable source of oil to deal with Saudi Arabia, terrorism-financer extraordinaire (I have been more detailed in several other posts, and I get bored writing the same thing over and over again, so no details for you ). So far, the US were handcuffed by Saudi, which explains how low the tensions are, with a regime obviously linked with terrorism and Al Qaeda.
I suppose you would agree with this statement, K. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:26
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Spiffor
Imran :
Except if I understate the paranoia and resentment that came from Sept. 11, I assume the Bushies will take whatever step necessary to reduce international terrorism.
Of course I cannot be sure, but I think many people in the American folk and in the White House are very pissed with the Sauds. If they are unshackled with their dependancy to the Sauds, the US will probably want to take action. Not necessarily war, but pressure on other aspects.
Before, the Sauds could simply have lowered their oil output, maybe with the help of OPEC countries. With Iraq in the hands of the US, they will lose very much of their bargaining power. |
America is the biggest productor of oil in the world also we are the biggest user of oil and the biggest waster of oil in the world. Than we are getting worst each year. The fuel cell
power car in america is than pipe dream the cost for than adverage america to buy than mass product fuel cell power
car is around 800,000 to 1,000,000 dollar. To than adverage america to own one will take than 40 year to 80 year car loan and the big car companies in America will
lose money when they built than car that last 80 year and
what about the labour union's. The test model car which
run off of fuel cell cost 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 dollar to built apeise.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
23-03-2003 01:38
|