 |
|
Artifex
|
|
Kentucky USA
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
Which leads me to another question. How bad of a diplomatic penalty is it for you to sneak attack while in an enemies territory?
Is it worth it?
Is the diplomatic penalty devastating?
I have never played that way since I thought that basically killed any trading/diplomacy options for the rest of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Artifex
|
|
Kentucky USA
Apr 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
So archer rushing is out unless you want to sneak attack? I just read where sneak attacks and RoP rapes don't carry a bad enough penalty and that its such an effective strategy that its viewed by many forum members as a cheap exploit? true?
Funny I never thought of trying it as much as I play Civ III. Maybe thats the sure fire easy way to win on emperor every time. I got that impression from the thread I read in the archives.
If so, has the penalty been stiffened in recent patches?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
minke19104
|
|
Check out badams thread at CFC... There's a link from here somewhere about attitudes. ROP Rape hurts you pretty bad in my games..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ephesos
|
|
Just so you know, that's a problem on the lower difficulties too. In a warlord game, I missed capturing three cities this way. However, the capitol thing does work.
In all seriousness though, fast attackers will win the day. Get hordes of horsemen. This works particularly well for the Iroquois, since that's their UU.
Other than that, simply try to hit all at once. RoP violations will definitely hurt you later, so just rush in from the border, avoiding attacking penalties (across rivers, defender-garrisoned mountains, etc.) and you should be fine.
Hopefully you'll soon be able to stop doing this .
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|