 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
also, we see this land with no signs of inhabitants
anywhere you go in our claimed territory you will see signs of inhabitation (roads or culture)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
Speaking for myself (and this is not an official Gathering Storm position), I find it amazing that there's so much heat over Vox's settling land practically next door to their capital just because the land happens to be across a tiny bit of water - especially when that land was originally destined to belong to a civ that doesn't even exist anymore. Vox finds themselves in the odd position that land on another continent is closer to their capital, and therefore would have lower corruption, than land practically anywhere on their own continent. I'm curious as to what Glory of War, Role Play, or Neu Demogyptica would do if you found yourselves in Vox's position.
Most of the time, I think it makes perfect sense that a civ's deciding to claim land on another continent be viewed as a bit, um, aggressive. But in the unusual circumstances of this case, insisting that Vox leave looks mostly just plain greedy.
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hot_Enamel
|
 |
Melbourne, Australia
Aug 2002 time: 14:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nbarclay
Speaking for myself (and this is not an official Gathering Storm position), I find it amazing that there's so much heat over Vox's settling land practically next door to their capital just because the land happens to be across a tiny bit of water - especially when that land was originally destined to belong to a civ that doesn't even exist anymore. Vox finds themselves in the odd position that land on another continent is closer to their capital, and therefore would have lower corruption, than land practically anywhere on their own continent. I'm curious as to what Glory of War, Role Play, or Neu Demogyptica would do if you found yourselves in Vox's position.
Most of the time, I think it makes perfect sense that a civ's deciding to claim land on another continent be viewed as a bit, um, aggressive. But in the unusual circumstances of this case, insisting that Vox leave looks mostly just plain greedy.
Nathan |
If I was in Vox's position, I would certainly announce my intention and bargain with the closest civs on the new continent before landing settlers and immortals.
We are not greedy, the land is simply a spoil of war. Both ND & GoW earned the rights to the land.
Perhaps GS should consider their actions, if they found themselves in ND, GoW's or RP's position, and discovered an invasion force and a settler preparing to create a city as a staging point for war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FrustratedPoet
|
 |
All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Mar 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
I agree that if they promised not to settle, and then went back on their word, a declaration of war is more easily justified.
Last edited by FrustratedPoet on 25-03-2003 at 17:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
[DG]mav_son
|
|
Switzerland
Nov 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
To give peace a chance I recommend Vox to abandon their newly founded city on Borconia and to leave the continent immediatly with all their troups!
The people in ND are very upset...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mjmacy
|
|
Madison, WI
Mar 2003 time: 23:27
|
|
WE have just as much right to the land as you do. this war may be a bad idea, But it is one we feel is more about principle and setting an example for the rest of the game. You can't just claim all the territory you like. You must earn it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
far from both your capitals
Jon Milelr
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|