 |
| |
|
|
Jasonian
|
 |
Ruins of Jasonia Palace
Sep 1999
time: 00:13
|
|
I've come across two things while working on my Star Wars mod. One should help you people out, and one I need help on myself.
The first is these so called "Ethics" techs of mine. The idea is to give each faction their own starting tech that no one can research and can only get in trade.
The first test:
Empire Ethics,EmpEth,0,0,0,0,None,None,000000000
This didn't work at all. The faction starts with the tech, but all factions could research it at any time. Hmm...
The second test:
Ethics,EmpEth,0,0,0,0,Disable,Disable,000000000
This was promising. However, when I started a game, the faction not only didn't have the tech and couldn't build the units that come with it, but it didn't even appear in the datalinks entry with all the tech names! An interesting note was that the custom units still said that their pre tech was "Empire Ethics", even though nothing else mentioned it all all. Hmmm...
The third test:
Ethics,EmpEth,0,0,0,0,TranT,None,000000000
This seems to be the best. If the other factions have gotten Trancent Thought and STILL don't have your tech, they deserve to be able to research it. It works in the game pefectly. So, if you want to create a tech no one else can research, I recomend the above model.
NOW: THE QUESTION
While scanning the tect list, I noticed there were two "deleted" techs (One about Spartans shooting at reactors and one with Morgan claiming "energy is the currency of the future," which it is), plus the "User Tech." That makes three techs that we can use. I want to create 8. If I place new techs at the bottom of the list, will they work correctly in the game?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
No, unfortunately you cannot, from what my experiments show. I also discovered that TranT method of giving access to a tech only to a faction unless given as a bonus at start, but never found a use for it till you mentioned it. Great work.
One thing you can do, though, is reassign some all of the attributes of a few of the existing techs, like maybe Optical Computers (which is a pretty useless tech as it gives you nothing anyway) or some of the new SMACX tehs. Then remap and rename the old tech to whatever you want, freeing up a slot. Though my intuition tells me that clearing 5 more techs and compressing their attributes elsewhere is going to be a real stretch...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
Why don't you send me a copy of your alpha.txt file (including the techs that will not work in the empty slots), and I'll see if I can help, since I have a lot of experience remapping tech trees. I promise not to steal any of your ideas -- my SNAX 1.3 mod is basically finished, I am just now working on the readme and the strategy guide.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000
time: 22:13
|
|
Hey Jasonion, I have a suggestion and a couple of comments. First of all, why don't you call your new tech Emperial Ethics (rather than Empire Ethics). It sounds better to the ear.
Your mod sounds pretty good. I'll enjoy having a look at it when your playtest is finished. I would like to do a mod myself. I am full of ideas, but don't even have enough time to play, let alone learn all the arcana necessary to successfully build a decent mod pack.
As for your comment regarding energy being the currency of the future, I disagree. Energy is valuable currently (no pun intended), but this situation is subject to change. If we were able to develop Fusion power at only a fraction of it's potential, any economy based upon the value of energy would collapse immediately. That is why it is better to have a currency which is inherently worthless, but whose value floats on the value of everything else. It provides stability, which is the crucial element in saving and investment. Also, who would want to transfer and store actual energy, when one could use E-currency at a fraction of the cost?
Smac is a fun game, but it's social commentary and future science are badly done. Notice the SE numbers for Free Market for instance. What a joke. I guess all of the varying examples of nations with free market economies in the world today somehow were missed by the design team, while they seem to cling to their ivory tower view of how the world 'really' works. The SE was a good idea, but it's relevance to the historical human experience is questionable at best. Even the game play aspects of the SE are sloppy. Many of the factions designed by Fireaxis are forced into making SE choices which produce diminishing returns, and forbidden from making more balanced selections. I think this is one of the reasons that so many people want to make their own factions.
The implications of the science are even worse. To further use the example of fusion power cited above, what are the game effects of it's discovery? None of them are economic, even though the economy is based upon the 'Joule' standard. Instead, military units become cheaper (reasonable depending on how much of the production cost is based on energy), and have more hit points. Huh? Meanwhile the guy who goes into the forest to chop wood for energy still goes to work each morning, completely secure that his job is just as valuable to the economy as it was yesterday. Why would a 'clean' reactor make a unit free from upkeep costs? The list is endless.
Of course the way to fix this stuff is for the player to modify the game in a more logical manner. There are two problems with this however. The first problem is that the means for doing this are poorly implemented by Fireaxis. Until someone puts together an integrated tool to help designers modify the game, only a few people will bother. The second, and more intractable problem is that the AI will be more and more crippled by any changes the designer makes to the game. The extent to which you, Alexander III and a few others have been able to succeed is a credit to you, and I wish you guys all the best in your endevors.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sikander on 02-09-2000 04:30 AMThe second, and more intractable problem is that the AI will be more and more crippled by any changes the designer makes to the game. The extent to which you, Alexander III and a few others have been able to succeed is a credit to you, and I wish you guys all the best in your endevors.
|
Most of what you said here I agree with -- and it's only a game. What I must take issue with here is that extensive modification will cripple the AI. Yes, that is true, but only if the designer is completely inept, in which case the mod will be unplayable anyway. In my SNAX mod, I've actually managed to make the AI better builders, better terraformers, able to make improved SE choices, and being more innovative in their choice of unit combinations. Look forward to charing all these secrets with you when the mod is out in May.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 02, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 02, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--multiple posts deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 02, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
--deleted--
[This message has been edited by AlexanderIII (edited May 01, 2000).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AlexanderIII
|
|
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
Holy ****! Sorry for the mmmmmultiple replies... problems with my server...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Helium Pond
|
|
Los Anheles, California, Good Ole U S of A
Nov 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
ALexanderIII, I've seen this kind of thing happen to you before, in another thread, I forget which. Would you mind, when this happens, using the "edit" feature above the excess messages, and deleting them down to one line saying something like "mutiple posts deleted"? That would be a gentlemanly thing to do.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13.
Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-12-1999 09:11
|
|