 |
|
Vaporeons_Rage
|
|
North America
Mar 2003 time: 00:26
|
|
I'm already into modern times and I havent been able to get it o_O
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dida
|
|
Being a theory doesn't mean it's factual. Those theories that we know to be true is called theorems or laws, etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dida
Being a theory doesn't mean it's factual.
|
True.
quote:
Those theories that we know to be true is called theorems or laws, etc. |
Sorry if this is off-topic:
It is not possible to prove any scientific theory "true" or "false". The word 'theorem' is reserved for mathematics, where results never start out as theories (and if they do, they either get proved, get disproved, or go into the "puzzle" category). The word "law" is horribly misleading and arrogant to apply to any scientific theory, since it implies knowledge of the true structure of things, which is not really available to us. The source of the implication is that laws cannot, by definition, be shown to be "incorrect". The "law" of gravitation, for example, is really a theory. The theory of evolution is aptly named.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Divvy
|
|
Well alot of people do consider the theory of evolution to be "factual", for some darwinism is their religion.
I read somewhere that at some university people who did not "believe" in the theory of evolution because of their religious convictions failed the course even if they understood the theory fully and othervice passed the course.
I donno if this is common practise or not.
From what I've gathered I believe there is no such thing as what is portrayed by those so common pictures of a fish jumping out of the sea, eventually turning into a human being.
I can't see how stuff could randomly evolve to all the species that exists today, there is no convincing proof of that either.
btw I do believe in the Bible. You say beliving in religious "myths" (God) is nonsense, but find it easily believable that this enormous universe with all it's complicated life forms could suddenly just randomly "evolve" to what it is today out of nothing?!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fosse
|
|
U.S.A.
Mar 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Divvy
I read somewhere that at some university people who did not "believe" in the theory of evolution because of their religious convictions failed the course even if they understood the theory fully and othervice passed the course.
|
A few weeks or months ago it was in the news that a biology professor at a university would not write letters of recommendation for students trying to get into Biology graduate programs if they didn't believe in evolution. His reasoning was that modern biology puts a lot of stock in evolution, and if you don't agree with that theory then you can't agree with a huge portion of the current thinking.
I think tha tthis is what you're refering to. (though we could be talking about two seperate things)
It's not all that common, I don't believe. Otherwise this guy wouldn't have gotten into the news.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Divvy
btw I do believe in the Bible. You say beliving in religious "myths" (God) is nonsense, but find it easily believable that this enormous universe with all it's complicated life forms could suddenly just randomly "evolve" to what it is today out of nothing?! |
You find it easier to believe that a big man in the sky waved his magic wand and made everything in a week than to believe that humans evolved from monkeys (who have something like 99 per cent of our DNA), and birds evolved from prehistoric winged dinosaurs (again, sharing much of the same traits)? And what of the evidence sicentists have that the earth is indeed millions of years old?
I've always thought of the Bible as a kind of allegory. It made such an impact on ancient peoples that it lingers even today, but one should never think it anything more than an ancient attempt to explain human existence, and it should not be considered more scientifically 'sound' than the theory of evolution and subsequent scientific discoveries which reinforce it.
As a matter of 'belief', rather than science, then of course any person can believe in their religion. We all need our spiritual and moral reassurances.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandias
|
|
Epistemology -- the study of how we know anything -- long ago gave up trying to "prove" or "disprove" anything (part of the problem may be hinted at by Godel's theorem, that the elements of a set cannot, in themselves, fully define that set).
Generally -- simply -- the explanation ("theory") with the greatest heuristic power (i.e., that which explains the most phenomena under question) is taken to be "true". The only place "belief" enters in is whether or not a cogent argument can be made for or against data fitting within the given theoretical framework.
... Which means that evolution is "true". It is observed at work (famously, on micro-time levels -- years compared to eons) in the predominance of moth's wings' colors in polluted areas as well as the elongation and/or shortening of Gallapagos finchs' beaks.
Also, contrary to some common opinion, the geological record is chock-full of intermediary forms between "original" and "evolved" creatures. Sequence of these creatures' fossils is performed by carbon dating analysis etc. -- and (here I paraphrase) it's not as though there are two sets of the laws of physics. If you don't believe in carbon dating then you shouldn't believe that elevators work.
IIRC the state of Kansas recently -- and briefly -- made the teaching of the "theory" of evolution optional; early in the 20th century, the Kansas state legislature also legislated a finite number for pi.
-Oz
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ozymandias
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MotownDennis
Seems to me like everyone is assuming there are only two possiblities. Why do we have to pick one or the other? Is it so inconceivable that BOTH Creationism and Evolution could have happened? |
As stated -- yes, impossible. HOWEVER, I've always assumed that a Divine Plan (being Divine, vast beyond our comprehension, etc.) could be enacted any way the hypothetical Divinity chose, including starting with a Big Bang and letting self-awareness come along but slowly. How can this posssibily then diminish either this hypothetical Divinity or its spark of manifestation in each of us?
Cosmologically, Epistemologically, & Thread-Jackingly Yours,
Oz
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlueWaldo
|
|
Missouri, USA
Jan 1970 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ozymandias If you don't believe in carbon dating then you shouldn't believe that elevators work. |
Then tomorrow I start using the stairs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Murray
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BlueWaldo
Then tomorrow I start using the stairs. |
That's the spirit!
And whoever said that religion halts the advance of progress...?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Azeem
|
|
And whoever said that religion halts the advance of progress...?
It really depends on what religion. Some religions are suspicious of scientific learning (such as Medieval Christianity) while some embrace it (like Islam during the Middle Ages). Then there are some that are neither suspicious nor interested...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|