Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Alpha Centauri > AC-Creation > Mod Idea: fix Fundamentalism
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: ZAKHAROV TURNS ELEVEN
15.Sep: `POSSIBILITY` IS ALL FOR NOW
15.Sep: THE SINGULARITY CONNECTION

bottom of page
  - ALPHA CENTAURI PC $9.99 - Centauri Dawn $6.50 - Dragon Sun $6.99 - Twilight of the Mind $6.99 - Power of the Mindworms $8.95 - ALPHA CENTAURI MAC $19.99
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
mikejohnson1
Guest

Not Yet
time:
Post  Old Post 10-01-2000 06:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Mod Idea: fix Fundamentalism Inflate your Upload Space

It's about time to do something about Fundy. Forget Free Market, Fundamentalism is the WORST SE choice in the game in my humble opinion. I myself once believed Free Market was too limiting, but I relized that the +2 Economy was a pretty tremedous benefit indeed. But Fundamentalism has very few redeeming qualities to offset it's -2 Research penalty. Also the existence of it doesn't really make much sense either. Think about it, there is no other faction except Mariam whose ideology would include setting up a fundamentalist government except Cha Dawn. Fundamentalism seems to exist for the sake of one faction, Mariam. And fundamentalism is more a value system than it is a form of government. In fact in my SMAC2 and SMACX2 modpacks I've eliminated Fundamentalism and replaced it with the cultism social choice. Cultism is a form of government where the people unite behind a leader who claims himself to be the future, or the one destined to rule. Cultism can fit in the ideological mythos of several factions, while Fundamentalism only fits into the mythos of the religious factions(only Mariam really because it seems the Fundamentalism is made to be rule by a CHRISTIANITY. So there are no Muslims or Jews on Alpha Centauri?) My cultist SE(which I'm trying to think of a better name, cultism doesn't sound quite right) could be used by many groups, as both a good thing and a bad thing. Cultism could be used by a manipulative leader that is trying to brainwash his population into serving him/her. Or it could be adopted by a great leader, whose charisma, benevolence, and command presence inspires a sense of awe into his/her people. But that is only for my mod, what are we going to do about "real" SMAC? Fundamentalism is the least attractive political choice in the game. I usually use Democracy, and sometimes Police State, I never, NEVER use Fundy, ever. It's morale bonus can easily be duplicated with social engineering, and it's probe bonus isn't worth giving up the extra growth and efficiency of Democracy, and the support bonus of police state. And the probe bonus only makes half sense. Sure religion will decrease the chance of an enemy brainwashing your population, but how does religion make it easier for your spies to carry out acts of sabotage, and espionage? The game doesn't give any incentives for fundamentalism unlike Civ 2.

Let it be known that I'm not a fan of Civ 2's fundy either. I hate how it portrays religion as evil. Fundy governments are the only governments that can produce fanatic terrorists? Fundy allows nations to get away with nuclear atrocities becuase the other nations expect no better from you. But on the other hand it offers some neat benefits that aren't present in SMAC. 10 support free units, tithe, and no unhappy citizens. Well the unhappy citizens part is unrealistic, there's no way you're going to convince me that the entire population of Talliban Afganistan is content. But Civ2's fundy has some incentive to use it(though I don't use fundy in that game either.)

I think a great mod would be to combine the benefits of both SMAC's and Civ 2's fundy's.
How about this:
+2 MORALE
+3 TALENT {Though not everyone is content, religion does quell some dissent in the nation}
+2 PROBE
-4 RESEARCH: {Greater penalty to offset the Talent bonus}

how about that?

And on a final note, in CIV3 and SMAC2(if there is one) Fundamentalism should NOT be a form of government, it should be a system of values. The should be a religion value choice or something like that. That way you could have a religious democracy, and Mariam wouldn't bother you simply becuase you are using a democratic form of government.

JamesJKirk is offline JamesJKirk
King
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970
time: 21:13
Post  Old Post 10-01-2000 12:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

I agree completely about the fact that it isn't a form of government and is unfairly portrayed as evil (not to mention unbalenced in Civ2)I actually got rid of it in a mod I made recently, and I added a military dictatorship, for the very reason that fundamentalist governments of all types existed: A Republic/Democracy like Iran, dictatorship like Afganistan or Cromwellian England, etc, etc, so yes, good job bringing up something major that needs to be fixed and kept out/

SEE is offline SEE
Chieftain

Nov 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 10-01-2000 13:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by mikejohnson1 on 01-09-2000 08:03 PM
My cultist SE(which I'm trying to think of a better name, cultism doesn't sound quite right)


Perhaps monocracy? Roughly "Rule by one", covers everything from cults of personality to monarchies. Examples of monocracies include French royal absolutism, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, and Stalin's USSR.

And if you're going to call it "monocracy", I'd replace "Police State" with Bureaucracy. Examples include the post-Stalin USSR, Imperial China, modern Japan (despite the Diet), and the Roman Catholic Church.

AlexanderIII is offline AlexanderIII
Warlord
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 11-01-2000 02:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

I quite agree about the Fundamentalism SE choice being next to useless. Here's what I put in my SNAX modpack to be released soon: change Fund. to:

Frontier, None,
Police State, DocLoy, ++POLICE, ++SUPPORT, --EFFIC
Democratic, EthCalc, ++EFFIC, ++GROWTH, --SUPPORT
Theocratic, Brain, ++MORALE, +PROBE, -RESEARCH, -ECONOMY

As Theocracies (governments ruled by a religious order, like Vatican City, for example, or some middle-eastern countries) would have less research, yes, put not as crippling as Fundamentalism. A ++PROBE is too powerful in my view for Miriam, so it gets a +PROBE only, as a relgious government would get a slight but not an overwhelming advantage in spying and subversion. As far as the -ECONOMY, well, most nations hesitate to establish extended trade relations to a country that may very well bite the hand that feeds them at any moment over a religious issue, and their infrastructure is simply not geared to handle a large western-style economy due to religious prohibitions of what can and cannot be sold.


While I'm at it, another SNAX mod change I made was to that other least desirable SE choice, Free Market. It simply made more sense to change it to:

Free Market, IndEcon, ++ECONOMY, ----PLANET, ---POLICE


The original -5 Police is WAY to harsh for anyone using it. By bumping up PLANET from -3 to -4, the faction now has a -40% to psi warfare, making it increasingly vulnerable to Mind Worm attack, which I think balances things out nicely.

JamesJKirk is offline JamesJKirk
King
Dixon, CA USA
Jan 1970
time: 21:13
  Old Post 11-01-2000 14:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Just a minor note:

Rule by one is called an autocracy, I don't know why they used auto instead of mono, they just did

Stefu is offline Stefu
Emperor
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970
time: 07:13
Post  Old Post 12-01-2000 10:06 Visit Stefu's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Best term could be "Caesarism" which was what O. Spengler predicted to be the number one goverement type of future.

SEE is offline SEE
Chieftain

Nov 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 12-01-2000 12:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by JamesJKirk on 01-11-2000 04:19 AM
Rule by one is called an autocracy, I don't know why they used auto instead of mono, they just did


Actually, monocracy is an accepted, if more rarely used, synonym for autocracy. Another synonym is autarchy, often confused with autarky (which denotes national self-sufficiency in production). Monarchy was originally a fourth synonym, but its meaning has drifted in English.

So autarchs, monocrats, and autocrats are all the same type of ruler, and what the rule can interchangably be be called autarchies, monocracies, and autocracies. I personally usually use "monocracy" because it better avoids unintentional confusion with autarky.

Fugi the Great is offline Fugi the Great
Warlord
Sheboygan,WI,USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 13-01-2000 04:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

When I used to play Civ 1 or 2, I used to never use Fundy, it cripled the science department. Instead, I used the Fascist patch since it was a government that made sense in the warmongering game of CIV. Sure you could create dozens of units and not have to pay for their upkeep with Fundy, but you could not keep up with the Democracies and Republics technologically, but with Fascism you still keep up fairly well with the Dems and Repubs with science. I would like it changed to Fascism.

Captain Kirk is offline Captain Kirk

Dec 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 18-01-2000 02:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Fundamentalism can actually be used fro other factions than the Belivers. The Spartans could use it to boost their Morale to +2. When they originally use Power they have +3 Morale. Using Fundy you can make it +4 Morale. Who is fearsome now ?

I did that in a game I was playing. You can also use it if your the Gaians. To raise your Morale from -1 to 0. You can use it during wartime to give your guys ggod morlae.

Peace
Democracy/Planned/Knowledge

War
Fundamentalist/Planned/Power

You see what I mean. Alos if you have trouble with the Data Angels or with the Beleivers. Or anybody's probe teams. You can use it to boost your security. I've played the Believers lots of times before. And the -4 Research just doesn't seem to matter as time wears on. -2 doesn't seem as bad. The Drones have that.

And as to the fact that it is only suited for Miriam. Other factions can use it. Santaigo and Deirdre can boost their Morale with it. Anyone using Knwoledge can use it to offset their Probe penalty (Yes I know it basically kills your Research bonus though).

So all around if used in the right way Fundy can be a good government.

Doug325 is offline Doug325
Chieftain
Marlboro, MA USA
Feb 2000
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 12-03-2000 04:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

For Fundamentalism how about this
+1 Morale ( Soldiers on "crusade" will fight harder)
+2 Probe ( Better spying )
-1 Research ( Science in low regard )
-1 Economy (Less interest in making money)

This will make Fundy a little more usable

ir is offline ir
Chieftain

May 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 13-03-2000 15:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

Fundy IS better than Police State. Wrost thing about Police is -2 effic. It leads to huge drone problems on Transcend. Power IMO is better for support in war time even w/ -2 industry. Demo with -2 support is just pain when it goes to wars.
+1 morale is the same as +2 if you attack. If you defend that extra morale is not big deal coz' of attack/defense bonus.
+2 probe is real bonus of Fundy. Change to Fundy and simple scout is 100+EC to bribe. Will you buy enemy troops that so costly? I think not.
Moreover, better effic compare to Police means you have more energy. If you like your science don't worry about Fundy but be sure to lose Probes and be treatened by Probes.
Yes, it seems like it was designed for Miriam but why Miriam has +1 probe and -2 research. Coz' with Fundy she can easy get any tech from others.
Hive and UoP are better w/ Police but Miriam and Morgan are better under Fundy. Morgan under Fundy/Green-FM/Wealth is huge headache with all his money and tons of elite probes. Don't underestimate Fundy.

About reality. This is a game w/ limited abilities. It's impossible to introduce all present forms of goverment or specify them correctly. TBSs are made for balance gameplay and shouldn't be a mirror of reality 1:1. If it did it would be near 10 different options to choose like goverment, economics, values, religion, philosphy etc. This is a game. Nothing more.

P.S. Spartans have +2 morale and dont need bot Fundy and Power to get +4 morale. IMO Police is better for Spartans coz' +3 police doubles police strength of troops.

AlexanderIII is offline AlexanderIII
Warlord
Canada
Aug 1999
time: 05:13
Post  Old Post 04-05-2000 13:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

--Bump--

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13.
Apolyton Time is 00:13.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0401 seconds (91.42% PHP - 8.58% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net