 |
|
Murtin
|
|
Sweden
Dec 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
Instead of spreading the AA capability to more units I think I would prefer a "softer" AA-rule whereby the defender gets a huge defense bonus if the attacker doesn't have AA capability. Defenseless workers and outposts wouldn't work as blockers, while proper military units would make a marine-less AA prohibitively expensive.
Anybody who likes that idea?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Aramis
|
|
Not where I was tomorrow, nor will be yesterday.
Dec 2002 time: 23:27
|
|
In the above posts I see it suggested that bombardment can take out an OP (RT, AF), but has anyone actually tried it? I'll try, if present game gets that far, but in the meantime . . . ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Bombardment can definitely take out an Radar Tower - I have done that on many occasions. I doubt if OP's or airfields are any different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Avaron
|
|
couldnt someone mod a graphic to look like some sort of costal defence that can be built by workers?..
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MyOlde
|
|
Haliburton, Ontario, Canada
Jun 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
You can be faced with a fair amount of coastline to defend -- and waste a lot of workers' lives. Why not stick outdated warriors, archers, etc on those tiles?
I like my workers for cleaning up pollution. In my current game, I'm being very warmongering, picking up some workers along the way, but because I'm producing war materials like mad I'm polluting like mad, too. So all those workers are barely keeping up with the pollution.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|