 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
One of the best known, most expensive strip joint in Montreal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote:
Obi wan, still a few problemes with order in your sentence
I know French is hard.
|
Lul Thyme:
Edit my sentence then, so that I can improve, svp.
Last edited by Ben Kenobi on 25-03-2003 at 05:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Bravo, spiffor. Une petite amie, en francais est une 'blonde' en quebecois. | Spotless 
quote: J'ai une brunette petite amie aussi. | -> J'ai aussi une petite amie brune.
The adjective is most often after the noun, but there are many exceptions (the word "grand" is the one that comes to mind, but also "petit", "beau", "long" and probably many others).
"Brune" is the French word for the adjective brunette. "Brunette" can only be used as a noun (i.e une brunette, but une fille brune). "Brune" remains more used as "Brunette" even as a noun. At least in France.
The location of the word [i"]aussi"[/i] is a mystery. I don't know the rule behind it.
quote: Peut-etre Richelieu sait autre mots. |
-> Peut être que Richelieu connaît d'autres mots
Out of my head, I think that "Peut être" is followed by "que" when the subject of the sentence is after. If you place "Peut être" in the middle of the sentence, it will probably not be followed by "que" (example : "Richelieu connaît peut-être d'autres mots") I advise you to use "Peut être" in the middle of sentences when possible, it doesn't change the sentence's structure, AFAIK.
The verb "savoir" sounds strange when it has a direct object. The verb "connaître" sounds better in this occurence. When there is a proposition behind, the verb "savoir" is self obvious (example : "Je sais que tu es ici" is a sentence in which the verb "connaître" would have no place)
About the "d'autres mots". AFAIK, French nouns always have a word to determine them. "The" translates in "le, la, les" ; a determined quantity translates in the French word for it ("a" translates as "un, une") ; and an undertermined quantity, while not expressed by any English word, has a word in French ("du, de la, des"). That's why a sentence like "Do you want milk" translates in "Voulez-vous du lait ?". Or "Do you have coins" translates in [i]"Avez-vous des pieces[i].
Hope it helps ! French language is sure a hell of rules, but if you get to live in a French speaking countries, you'll quickly assimilate most of them. However, some will remain a mystery for years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
About Connaître and Savoir, I thought about it again, and my theory doesn't hold water. While it is very strange to use Savoir when there is a direct object, its use is sometimes obvious in this very context : like "Do you know that ?" translates into "Le savez-vous ?" (where Le is the direct object).
However, in older French, Connaître and Savoir were used as you describe, AFAIK. If you read 18th century literature or theatre, the use of Savoir with direct objects will be everywhere.
quote: Merci, spiffor. Je vais plus de practice avec la langue francais, parce que je l'ai perdu. |
De Rien 
Ph34r the French teacher ! 
(more seriously, if you guys ever encounter one, fear the French teacher )
Correction of your sentence :
"Je vais plus pratiquer la langue française, parce que je l'ai perdue"
- the verb. As you see, there is no real verb in your sentence, since "Je vais" is used like "I will" and is followed by nothing. Practice is "la pratique" as a noun, or is "pratiquer" as a verb. "pratiquer une langue" is an idiotic idiomatic way to say it.
- the adjective : you forgot to accord the adjective "française" to the feminine noun "langue", no biggie.
- "je l'ai perdue". This is probably the most dreadful grammar rule a layman has to deal with. Countless times my grammar teacher explained it. Countless times the whole class didn't understand it. It is about according the past word ("perdu") to the direct object or not.
Normally, you accord the past word to the direct object if the latter is in front of the former : in you case, the "L' " (direct object) refers to the feminine "la langue", and hence "perdue" must become feminine. Had you said "J'ai perdu la langue", "perdu" would have remained unaccorded, because "la langue" was behind.
Is is more simple for reflexive verbs : the past word is always accorded to the gender of the subject : "elle s'est perdue" vs "il s'est perdu".
Bonne chance dans la pratique du Français ! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
edit
arg i hate these double posts
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Not bad at all Obi
Spiffor's corrections are better though of course
As he said, there are so many rules that its very hard to learn in a book, much easier by just living in a place where French is spoken.
In Quebec, ppl speak very bad French though, specially in my area, which is right across the river to Ontario.
The language used is a mix of english and french, ppl understand each other, but they cant speak good french or english, its a bit sad really.
specially when they are always fighting about language issues
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|