 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:27
|
|
I have to agree with Olaf that the Iraqis have not been up to speed even with what they have.
Given their situation, they should have wired all major bridges (which hy certainly had time for) and blown them. They should have kept more troops inside Baghdad and not stationed them so far out, and no, i don't think a coup threat would have been immenet. If the Iraqis have been able to keep regular army units in line through terror, they could the RG. They have wasted many many men in technicals: as i said, have them on foot. You have the same firepower but are a more difficult target to hit.
The Iraqis dont have the resources for a "doctrine" right now, What they could have been doing is taking common sense aproaches to thier significant inferiority. And, honetly, they could have been far more destructive towards thier own people in search of coolition casualties. For example, sned soem guy as a "fake" infomant, leading some coolition fighters (who woundn;t know better) to search some house which you rigged to blow. There, coolition casualties.
The tactics of teh iraqis have been subpar on all levels.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
Remember, the war's not over 'til the fat dictator croaks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
Which part of the war plan in particular was "brilliant", I wonder. Was it the at least 20-to-1 superiority in equipment and training? A decimated country from decades of mismanagement followed by crippling sanctions? Complete air dominance before a shot was fired? Troops that were actually fed?
I think I could come up with an equally "brilliant" plan of attack if I went to the nearest public school and beat the crap out of a second-grader.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
The British commander has lavished high praise on Tommy Franks and his war plan, saying it was "brilliant." |
So was Scwarzkopff's plan, and he won;t be getting a movie either.
How many times do you see Franks on TV? If this war is made into a movie, the guy playing Franks would get second billing.
As I said, the enemy is too inferior, the goal inherently political, not military, and it is all about the Bush, all of which makes for a rather forgatable theater commander, no matter how much currentl priase he gets. What people will be talking about in a few years is how new US weapons, not this plan, made this possible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frogman
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
Which part of the war plan in particular was "brilliant", I wonder. Was it the at least 20-to-1 superiority in equipment and training? A decimated country from decades of mismanagement followed by crippling sanctions? Complete air dominance before a shot was fired? Troops that were actually fed?
I think I could come up with an equally "brilliant" plan of attack if I went to the nearest public school and beat the crap out of a second-grader. |
Part of being brilliant is how easy you make it look. We took a risk with the early movement of what some said were not enough ground troops. The bee line to Baghdad, securing the oil fields, the targeted attacks, all were well planned and exectued. Sure we kicked them around like second graders, but only because we did a good job.
There is plenty of tough fighting ahead and there will be pockets of resistance for years. This is the part of the plan I'm worried about.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
spiritof1202
|
|
true... anyone can make an opposing force look good. The likelihood was low, but thats a function of 'pre-planning' of the construction of the force, including C3 assets.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|