 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
but i prefer games that racially stereotype my friends
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
what willem said
see willem, I can agree with you
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Willem
|
 |
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
btw(2), check the latest imarton news, the chinese are making great scientific advances! |
Cool. Maybe we should get them to work on the email spam problem.
PS If we could tie that into a call display system, we could give telemarketers a taste of their own medicine.
Last edited by Willem on 25-03-2003 at 01:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Olaf Hårfagre
I read the novel "Invasion" by Eric L. Harry a couple of years ago. There it is the other way around and US is invaded by China. The scene is perhaps 10-20 years from now, when the technology evolution ironically has made tanks, warplanes and ICBMs obsolete. The anti-missile defence of both sides eliminate the threath of ICBMs, while cheap, shoulder-fire missiles carried by every grunt can take out tanks and aircraft even beyond the horizon. So, basically the fighting is back to WW1-style but with better rifles.
Pure fiction, but an amazing future prediction. |
Hopefully in twenty years, economic integration will make it unprofitable for the U.S. to wage war on China (or vice versa). If that scenario takes place then the world is in for some major $hit.
---
As for the initial speculation in the thread that the U.S. will invade China -- uh, this is not a civ game, you know. A nuclear war in the real world will result in economic collapse, climate changes, and other things that might end human civilization.
In fact, I'd be surprised if America invades even, say, Iran. With the current diplomatic mess they'd want to cut losses and allow the sentiments to die down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
muppet
|
|
Igloo
Dec 2001 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SlowwHand
China executes more people than the rest of the world combined, and that includes Texas.
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
someone please do a comparison of the population of china and the rest of the world...
|
Texas 2002 Executions: 33
Texas 2002 Population: 21.5M
Texas Execution Rate 2002: 1.53 per Million
China 2001 Executions: 2,500
China 2001 Populations: 1.2B
China Execution Rate = 2.08 per Million
Difference is only 1 more execution per 2 million people. Not bad for a communist government and a backward people, eh?
In fairness, Texas only executed 17 people in 2001, however, Texas executed 40 people in 2000.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
quote: Excellent, theres nothing like listening to a draft dodger talking tough. |
I would've insulted you, but my English insults always sound lame.
I'll just have to civilly remind you that i'm a draft dodger who's going to commit himself for 9 years to the army, and 6 of them I'll be actively serving.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|