 |
|  |
 |
|
Brizey
|
 |
The Republic of Texas
Apr 2002 time: 23:27
|
|
As an American, my emotions have been on a roller coaster for the last week. Just to set things straight, I support the war. All of the logical arguments against it are absolute bunk. For example, the "illegal" thing. Sorry, but sorvereign states cannot, by definition, do anything illegal. The US constitution, not the UN charter, is the supreme governmental instrument of American citizens. So as long as the constitution and the laws of the US are being followed...
Anyway, the point of that little diatribe was that emotions are what are driving rational people's views on this war. I suspect that a lot of the anti-war fervor is just a lot of latent anti-Americanism, and the war and lackluster American economy pushes a lot of people over the brink.
As I think about these issues, I ask myself, how do I feel about Iraqis? Do I allow myself to fall into the same trap? It all came home to me a few days ago during a press report on people who have been defacing Saddam posters, etc. This act supposedly carries the death penalty. I now realize whose side I am on. Excuse my vernacular, but people with the sack to do that deserve our support. The American psyche strives to support and root for such people. And as we now see, we do not let others feelings of guilt for the past, smug (and unearned) superiority complexes, and straightforward envy get in the way of helping those who deserve our help. Forget the oil, the terrorist threat, the WOMD, forget all that. The Iraqi people themselves deserve better. The price is steep. Yes Iraqi civilians will die. I expect American and British and Australian civilians will die in terroist counter-attacks. Maybe me. Somewhere in Iraq there is an Iraqi striving to be free. That's whose side I am on.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
There's a simple reason why you felt pleasure, and it's not hatred of Americans. It's the pleasure one feels when a bully get's his come uppence. Hah! Take that, George Bush!
Then you remember, George is safe, and those are just scared kids. Then you remember why you're against war. |
Instead of trying so hard to somehow make news, try watching it.
Have you seen the Iraqi people? Glad we're there, but mad they got b1tch-slapped last time by Hussein for dissention, because the worthless U.N. took their ball and went home?
Have you heard from Human Shields able to return home.
They tell of being asked, "When? When are they going to start ?", citing that they might commit suicide if the action didn't start soon, preferring suicide to living under the brutality, torture, and murder perpetrated by Hussein.
You go on, Che. Go protest. God forbid you actually watch, listen, or read.
I wouldn't want you to be informed or anything.
You don't have a clue.
When this is all over, and France and other's dirty laundry are out there flapping in the breeze, what will you say?
Hopefully, not a damned thing.
BTW, Bush was asked to debate, not duel.
Two points. The request was crap.
Had it beena duel, Hussein's punkass would be dead. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nationalist
|
 |
None of your Goddamned business
Nov 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Der PH
Nothing exciting so far, but when I saw the US soldiers captured by the Iraqis on TV, my first reaction was pleasure and satisfaction.
Reflecting these feelings I started to become very afraid of myself. How could I be happy, that human beings are captured, maybe mistreated and most possibly undergo their personal hell?
I wanted the US to get a bloody nose in Iraq so much, that I actually enjoyed the obvious suffering of those POWs.
|
Der PH
This means that you have a sense of Nationalism. I know that Germans are brain washed from birth to try and breed out that "evil German Nationalism", but Germans and other Europeans still have nationalistic feelings. The U.S. is a rival with whom you have serioius disagreements with, and you enjoy it when they suffer setbacks & injuries. You aren't really thinking of the people on a personal level.The UNSC debate is an example of the strength of both French and German nationalism. They want to balance American power. Do you really think anyone would mention it if Guinea didn't support the war, but France, Russia, and China did. No way. Europeans are in reality reacting to the growth and assertion of American power, not to some enlightened feeling about the need for international justification.
Its O.K. to be nationalistic, even if you are a German. Nazi Germany didn't arise in a vaccuum, and Germany doesn't hold the sole responsibility for the Second World War. I think that it is time for people to allow the Germans to hold their heads up again.
Last edited by nationalist on 26-03-2003 at 09:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Traianvs
|
 |
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Amesjustin
Which is why I referenced the BBC. Go to BBC.com and look for the speech Tony Blair gave before they voted to go to war.
As far as proof of Iraqs WMD - that same speech by Tony Blair. You can also come visit the graves of my two cousins and a neighbor of mine who died extremely rare forms of cancer while in their early 20's - all within 4 years after Desert Storm.
Iraq also said they have no long range missiles. How many have they fired into Kuwait so far? 18 or so? I am not sure but any number greater than 0 is proof of a lie. Saddam has said numerous times over the past twelve years that they have no WMD type materials, and numerous times over the past twelve years he has been proven a liar.
I am convinced. |
LOL, have you got any brains up there? or are you one of those 87% Of Americans that can't point Iraq on a map.... Just pointing out that Iraq borders with Kuwait and that it doesn't need long distance rockets to hit Kuwait at all... What is true though is that they had a few missiles that reached farther than was officially allowed, but only with an extra 50 kilometers etc, these missiles couldn't get to Israel anyway.. who gives a damn about that.
Btw I know about Tony Blairs speech, and it didn't give me any evidence about WMD in Iraq. Further, being a proven liar doesn't mean you lie about everything right? I think he realizes that if WMDs were actually found, that he would be in big trouble as he didn't report those. Another thing, Saddam may have used chemical weapons in the first Gulf war, but so did the US. And btw the Us bombs have done more damage than chemical weapons from the IRaqis ever did.
For me it's not whether they used chemical weapons, a simple fragmentation bomb can cause just as much if not much much more damage to people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Amesjustin
|
 |
of nothing
Feb 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Trajanus
LOL, have you got any brains up there? or are you one of those 87% Of Americans that can't point Iraq on a map.... Just pointing out that Iraq borders with Kuwait and that it doesn't need long distance rockets to hit Kuwait at all... |
I see you are as mature as you are intelligent. I don't know where you got that figure but is pile of crap at best. The missiles in question traveled well past the allowed distance into Kuwait. If you are going rebutt my posts and accuse me of not doing my research, I suggest you do yours.
quote: Originally posted by Trajanus
Btw I know about Tony Blairs speech, and it didn't give me any evidence about WMD in Iraq. Further, being a proven liar doesn't mean you lie about everything right? I think he realizes that if WMDs were actually found, that he would be in big trouble as he didn't report those. Another thing, Saddam may have used chemical weapons in the first Gulf war, but so did the US. |
While being a proven liar doesn't necesarily mean you will lie about everything, when Saddam has told NOTHING BUT lies for 12 years about his WMDs, any person whose brain possesses the logic of at least a 6 year old would begin to assume that perhaps what he says should no longer be trusted.
BTW, please tell me what proof you have of the US using chemical weapons in Desert Storm?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|