 |
| |
|
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:27
|
|
I've seen a few threads that ask questions regarding rules that militaries are supposed to follow.
As a public service announcement, they are as follows:
The Rules of War
If it seems to you that there are always rules to follow, no matter what you do, you won't be surprised to learn that international law sets out strict rules of behavior for countries during wartime. The first modern international rules of war, known as the Geneva Convention, or Treaty, were made in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1864. This treaty was accepted by all the European countries, by the U.S., and by some countries in Asia and South America. New rules are added as they are needed.
Rule 1: Warring nations cannot use chemical weapons against each other.
Rule 2: The use of expanding bullets or materials calculated to cause unnecessary suffering is prohibited.
Rule 3: The discharge of projectiles (such as bullets or rockets) from balloons is prohibited.
Rule 4: Prisoners of war must be humanely treated and protected from violence. Prisoners cannot be beaten or used for propaganda purposes (to try to change the way people think about something).
Rule 5: Prisoners of war must give their true name and rank or they will lose their prisoner of war protection. (MIA stands for Missing in Action. POW stands for Prisoner of War.)
Rule 6: Nations must follow procedures to identify the dead and wounded and to send information to their families.
Rule 7: Killing anyone who has surrendered is prohibited.
Rule 8: Zones must be set up in fighting areas to which the sick and injured can be taken for treatment.
Rule 9: Special protection from attack is granted to civilian hospitals marked with the Red Cross symbol.
Rule 10: The free passage of medical supplies is allowed.
Rule 11: Shipwrecked members of the armed forces at sea should be taken ashore to safety.
Rule 12: Any army that takes control of another country must provide food to the people in that country.
Rule 13: Attacks on civilians and undefended towns are prohibited.
Rule 14: Enemy submarines cannot sink merchant or business ships before passengers and crews have been saved.
Rule 15: A prisoner can be visited by a representative from his or her country. Prisoners have the right to talk privately without observers.
http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0769998.html
As you can see, not all country's play the game by the rules.
Last edited by SlowwHand on 25-03-2003 at 21:22
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Demerzel
|
|
If Iraq did not sign up to the Geneva convention then it isn't exactly forced to follow the rules is it?
And as said above, some signatories haven't exactly followed the convention strictly in cases yet feel they can use it as a blunt club to define "war crimes".
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Didn't the chemical weapons one start out as a rule against poisoned bullets and evolve after WW1 into a wider interpretation?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Demerzel
|
|
balloon warfare became redundant pretty quick which is why I suspect it's left in there but airplane based fighting was probably far too useful and thus never got included.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
The funny thing to me is that some people acuatly think that you can make rules for war, when you are at war and such, most countries will do what every it takes to win it or to defend themselves. To think that you can acuatlly make countries follow rules of war during a war is just too funny.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jack_www
The funny thing to me is that some people acuatly think that you can make rules for war, when you are at war and such, most countries will do what every it takes to win it or to defend themselves. To think that you can acuatlly make countries follow rules of war during a war is just too funny. |
We follow the the UK follows them, so forth and so on. The fact is that that notion: "no one follows the rules of war" is generally wrong. if your annalysis is correct, why haven't the following things already happened?
Blowing up southern oil fields, damns on the rivers, mass bombing of civilian centers, use of Chemical weapons, hell, use of nuclear weapons?
It is in everyone's interests to folow as many of these rules as possible since you never know when you will be at the recieving end. Hell, even the Nazi's generally followed the rules of war with those individuals they classified as worthy of the title "human being".
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by GePap
We follow the the UK follows them, so forth and so on. The fact is that that notion: "no one follows the rules of war" is generally wrong. if your annalysis is correct, why haven't the following things already happened?
Blowing up southern oil fields, damns on the rivers, mass bombing of civilian centers, use of Chemical weapons, hell, use of nuclear weapons?
It is in everyone's interests to folow as many of these rules as possible since you never know when you will be at the recieving end. Hell, even the Nazi's generally followed the rules of war with those individuals they classified as worthy of the title "human being". |
I was not talking about the US or UK, but their are many countries like Iraq and such that will never follow these rules, and from all that i have heard on the news, it almost sounds like people thought Iraq would follow these rules.
I am just saying it is funny to think that the US could expect Iraq or any other nation they go to war with to follow these rules, and if the US were the under dog and faced a superior eneimy they would do every thing they could to stop the invading army and not follow these rules.
I know US will follow these rules, and so would most countries in Europe, but dictators and such and other nations would never follow these rules and do every thing they could to win, I gues you did not get that from what I was trying to say and I just had to be more clear for you.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
How can you set up rules for war, when by its nature is chaotic?? War crime tribunals have not stop the worse abuse of the Geneva Convention in almost every war that has been fought.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
well I am trying to say it is absurred to make nations follow rules of war when you are at war with them, how in the world do you do it? Just too funny when I think about it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
|
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:27
|
|
A firefight is chaotic: war is not. Take any sporting event: you can say it is chaotic, but the madness has a method, and it has an aim.
Rules have always existed in anything people do: how far they follow them is one things, but war has always had rules, and the reason for that is to insure that not too much is wasted and destroyed while the aims of wars are achieved. One just needs to look at the cases were all rules were dumped to see what we have to lose if we do so. compare the war in the west in WW2 to that of the East or the Pacific Islands, and ask yourself: which of these scenerios do we want to emmulate?
It is still in the advantage of the US to demand for rules, as I said before, for simply selfish reasons (we can hit without hurting many civilians, they can't) but at the same time, the fact that we follow rules is the uderpinning of this self-imag of goodness we carry and promote. To act like Hussein, even if the aim is to get rid of him, is to perpetuate his type of behavior. You win a victory, but you lose the war.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
|
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ming
In the past... Nations followed the rules for good reasons...
They wanted their own prisoners to be treated fairly.
It seems to have worked in the past...
Now, that's not the case. |
Wait a minute: Saddam's goons tape the prisoners and interrogate them on camera, and we have evidence that they shot a few of them, and all of a sudden the Geneva convention is moot? The lost lives are a tragedy, and those who did this, if they live, will pay in court, but I find it insane to jump from a few killed to "its the ends of the rules!"?
The fact is that since these rules were set up, crimes against prisoners have occured. Look at what was done at Andersonville, during the battle of the bulge, to millions of Soviet prisoners, to Hundreads of thousands of prisoners taken by the Soviets, to anyone taken by the Japanese in WW2. The rules survived all these things and yet all of a sudden a minor incident, several orders of significance smaller occurs and its the end of rules a we know it'? We need a sense of scale here people, a reality check, no matter how unsentimental.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Just out of curiousity, are any of you that are having a problem grasping the concept Veterans?
Or have a Veteran in your family?
Yes or no, I'm astonished that you find any of this humorous. |
You miss understand, I am not saying war is funny. And I never did say that.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
25-03-2003 21:15
|
|