 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rothy
Boris, i have found you to be a very decent person here (hence my vote for yous some time back in that hall of fame milarky) but you are too sensative in regards to 'slurs' as you call them. Not long back you took offense to being called Queer, when most homosexual's consider this normal. It's understandable that you're sensative about this issue tho, just wish you were you more chilled about it.
Cheers
Matt |
You don't seem to note the context under which a poster called me a "queer," as it was clearly done in a context of derision. Most homosexuals, btw, would certainly bristle at a heterosexual referring to them as queers, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Perhaps that is different in the U.K., I don't know.
But while the contexts of "queer" is debatable, I respectfully proffer that shirt lifter, fudge packer, uphill gardener, and poo pusher are a world apart in terms of offensiveness. Considering the imagery that is conjured up in most gays' minds when such slurs are used (don't suppose being strapped to a fence and beaten to death with a pistol is fun), I don't understand why people express surprise that gays bristle at their use, especially from sources wherein the intent is unknown. It's rather like walking up to a black stranger and calling him a nigger and being stunned when he is outraged.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Frogman
|
|
Respect is something you earn, not something you give, and it doesn't have to be mutual. I can respect lots of people who may not respect me because they don't know me or perhaps because I haven't earned it. I think you are confusing respect, with respecting the rights of others which of course should be mutual.
So far MrFun, you haven't earned my respect because your posts sound a bit whiny and childish. Shouting RESPECT ME, RESPECT ME, is a sure way not to get it.
For me, I disagree as well with the military policy on gays, however, I have to respect people who have the discipline to perform under the intense pressure of combat. Regardless of what faults a person has, I will always honor the respect that is earned by the veterans who fought for our county. Sure there are plenty of vets who are racist, homophobic idiots, but I have to give them their due for at least one honorable deed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
You don't seem to note the context under which a poster called me a "queer," as it was clearly done in a context of derision. Most homosexuals, btw, would certainly bristle at a heterosexual referring to them as queers, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Perhaps that is different in the U.K., I don't know.
But while the contexts of "queer" is debatable, I respectfully proffer that shirt lifter, fudge packer, uphill gardener, and poo pusher are a world apart in terms of offensiveness. Considering the imagery that is conjured up in most gays' minds when such slurs are used (don't suppose being strapped to a fence and beaten to death with a pistol is fun), I don't understand why people express surprise that gays bristle at their use, especially from sources wherein the intent is unknown. It's rather like walking up to a black stranger and calling him a nigger and being stunned when he is outraged. |
But Boris, this means that you and I are PC fanatics, not reasonable people. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
korn469
|
 |
Poetic Justic
Apr 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: But Boris, this means that you and I are PC fanatics, not reasonable people. |
lol how true 
i'm joking but anyways
the biggest problem i see with allowing homosexuals in the military without DADT, is the discomfort the other soldiers would feel, especially with situations like showers, changing clothes, etc.
they probably shouldn't feel that discomfort, and they certainly shouldn't let the discomfort they feel grow into violence or feelings like that, yet it would difficult to change the average recruit's perception, and maybe more trouble than to revoke DADT
if it was a perfect world i don't think we'd need DADT (much less a military) but it's not, so i don't know what a good solution is
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SlowwHand
|
 |
of The Cooler
Sep 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
Too many times, when certain Gay posters have an opinion, everything spins back to Gay pride, and the injustice of it all.
Because of some Gays, other Gays get snapped at.
Not just by me, and not just here.
But look at RJ, even Boris , and starchild.
Well, not starchild maybe. But yeah, starchild too.
They have opinions that they express that have nothing to do with their sexual preference.
The same can't be said for all.
I'd feel the same if everything, I don't know, Chris (for example) said, had to do with banging his old lady.
Who cares?
And actually, being Gay is certainly not an assurance of being open-minded , norconclusive to the fact of not being a bigot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ajbera
|
 |
of the Cookieville Minimum Security Orphanarium
Apr 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SlowwHand
I'm for Gays in the military. In a separate division.
Women are generally separated from the men, and if you have a 3rd Interest, a 3rd group would be required.
|
I concur. However, this won't happen. The military would be concerned that members of the gay division would, well, y'know. That's sodomy, and the UCMJ sets the maximum punishment for sodomy as
quote: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 5 years. |
http://usmilitary.about.com/library...o/mcm/bl125.htm
The military is pretty puritanical. The max punishment for adultery is
quote: Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year. |
http://usmilitary.about.com/library...mcm/bl134-2.htm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
FrustratedPoet
|
 |
All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Mar 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
That seems like a peculiar double-standard.
So if a married guy has consensual sex with another guy while on active duty he's confined for 5 years.
But if a married guy has consensual sex with a women (who isn't his wife) while on active duty he's confined for only 1 year.
That seems like clear case of discrimination to me.
Last edited by FrustratedPoet on 27-03-2003 at 19:49
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|