 |
Land Mass and Water Coverage
This poll is closed. |
| A. Pangea 80% water |
   |
1 |
3.57% |
| A. Pangea 70% water |
   |
0 |
0% |
| A. Pangea 60% water |
   |
2 |
7.14% |
| B. Continents 80% water |
   |
4 |
14.29% |
| B. Continents 70% water |
   |
4 |
14.29% |
| B. Continents 60% water |
   |
1 |
3.57% |
| C. Archipelago 80% water |
|
7 |
25.00% |
| C. Archipelago 70% water |
|
2 |
7.14% |
| C. Archipelago 60% water |
|
1 |
3.57% |
| D. Random |
|
6 |
21.43% |
| Banana |
|
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
28 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fishman
|
|
After the last victory with a poor starting place, I think anything other than archipelago would not be enough of a challange.
In the last game, Apolyton's mastery of land wars and foreign affairs were superior to the computer players. An archipelago landmass would serve to challenge the new governments by making naval warfare and the ability to carry our amphibious invasions military priorities. Both were lightly used in the previous game.
By using an archipelago, the foreign affairs would be slowed down by having fewer and later contacts with the computer players. The ability to trade technologies would be reduced in the early game, slowing the human player.
I fear if we had continents or pangea, the game would be a cakewalk for the humans. We won the last game pretty easily even with a poor starting location. Yes there were some tense moments mostly in the French-Persian wars, but since then was the game really in doubt...
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-03-2003 10:30
|